No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
1 For a parallel see “A peculiar case of a Yuvaraja”, JRAS., 1917, p. 121Google Scholar. In that the appointment seems to have been an honorary one, but may it not have been the appointer's intention that it should carry with it the right of succession to the throne? In both cases the appointee was a Brahman.