No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Supplement.—Further Detail of Proofs that Colebrooke's Essay “On the Duties of a Faithful Hindu Widow” was not indebted to the Vivâdabhangârṇava
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
Extract
If the crucial instance which has already been adduced and laboured, for the intent indicated above, should be regarded as anywise inconclusive, the ensuing particulars will be found to complete my argument.
- Type
- Original Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1867
References
page 193 note 1 Vide supra, pp. 187–189.
page 193 note 2 Vide supra, pp. 185–187.
page 194 note 1 Raghunandana's, Institutes, Vol. ii., p. 132Google Scholar.
page 194 note 2 Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. i., p. 120.
page 194 note 3 For the true form of the passage, vide supra, p. 191, note 2.
page 194 note 5 Rigvedavâdât is required, prosodially; and Ṛigvedât is unidiomatical.
page 194 note 6 Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. i., p. 120.
page 194 note 7 Ibid., Vol. i., p. 119.
page 195 note 1 Vol. ii., p. 456.
page 195 note 2 Raghunandana's, Institutes, Vol. ii., p. 132Google Scholar. The verses are there quoted through the Kṛityatattwârṇava.
page 195 note 3 
page 195 note 4 The alternative, a gross absurdity, is, that the venerable Essayist at once suppressed the mention of an authority, and foisted into a sentence of some Sanskrit glossator a proper name of which that glossator knows nothing.
page 195 note 5 Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. i., pp. 117, 118.
page 195 note 6 Raghunandana's, Institutes, Vol. ii., p. 132Google Scholar.
page 195 note 7 Digest, Vol. ii., p. 460. The original here follows: 
page 195 note 8 It is quoted in the Digest, in the S'uddhitattwa, etc. etc. Colebrooke possessed a MS. of the Madana-pârijâta at an early period of his Sanskrit studies.
page 195 note 9 Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. i., p. 119.
page 195 note 10 Vol. ii., pp. 456, 457.
page 196 note 1 Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. i., pp. 117, 118. These extracts are from Vishṇu and Praohetas, and “The Smrῐti.” Colebrooke's reading of the last varies, as has been shown, from that of the Vivâdabhangârṇava.
page 196 note 2 Digest, Vol. ii., pp. 459–461.
page 196 note 3 Raghunandana's, Institutes, Vol. ii., pp. 131, 132Google Scholar.
page 196 note 4 Respectively given as anonymous, from Bṛihaspati, and from Gotama. See Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. i., pp. 119, 120.
page 196 note 5 Vol. ii., pp. 456–458.
page 196 note 6 Raghunandana's, Institutes, Vol. ii., p. 132Google Scholar.
page 196 note 7 That really from the Bṛihan-nâradîya-purâṇa and that from Bṛihaspati and Raghunandana combined.
page 196 note 8 In writing thus positively, I only expect it to be conceded that the identity of a passage is not destroyed by slight various readings.
page 196 note 9 Inasmuch as, against sixty-five lines of citation common between the Essay and the Vivâdabhangârṇava, there are at least ninety lines common between the Essay and the S'uddhitattwa, one might, in ignorance of the truth, be disposed to substitute this work, as the main promptuary of the Essay, in place of the Vivâdabhangârṇava; especially as the other was, probably, quite as accessible to Colebrooke, if not more accessible.
page 198 note 1 See this Journal, Vol. v., pp. 16–26. Some of my facts I have taken from other sources.