Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:57:00.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Supernatural in the Popular Belief of the Gilgit Region1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

Gilgit offers a rich field to the student of Folklore, and one which up to the present has been only partially worked.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 513 note 1 I have here accepted the relation of Bō. in and Bōyō as singular and plural which is morphologically quite in order, and is asserted by some, though denied by other, authorities. The word bo.in seems to survive in bō.indūrgas (pi. bō.in dūrgasho) which was explained as arwāḥ—the spirits of the dead. Dūrg-, occurring in other compounds, appears to refer to a dead person.

page 526 note 1 Cp. Yaḙḥōlo, p. 527, n.

page 527 note 1 I have lately come on an isolated note: “Yaḙḥōl, a demon like a bear.”