No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 883 note 1 Hillebrandt's view of Indra really refutes his own earlier theory of the date of the Mahāvrata (Rom. Forsch., v, pp. 299 seq.), which, as I shall hope to show on another occasion, is in any case untenable.Google Scholar
page 883 note 2 Cf. my notes, J.R.A.S., 1906, p. 493; 1907, pp. 465 seq., 490 seq.Google Scholar
page 884 note 1 Vedische Studien, i, p. 234.Google Scholar
page 884 note 1 History of Sanskrit Literature, p. 12.Google Scholar
page 884 note 1 See Bloomfield, , A.J.P., xxv, pp. 8–12.Google Scholar