Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:11:46.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional Independence and Élite Change in the Politics of 14th-Century Sri Lanka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Ananda S. Kulasuriya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dynastic changes are not an uncommon feature in history. In the history of Sri Lanka they have been especially common and have sometimes taken place in such a rapid succession that one might form the impression of their being a recurrent feature. One observes the succession of the Moriyas by the Lambakaṇṇas, followed by the Pāṇḍyas and the Kāliṅgas. Usually such changes have been the result of the weakness of the central political authority, internal discord, factional disputes, and other such decisive forces which provided excellent conditions and ideal opportunities for ambitious kings, particularly from the sub-continent, to invade the island. Sometimes they have been caused by less hostile circumstances, at least in their initial stages, such as appeals for intervention by rulers to outside powers. There seem to have been certain special forces and features that marked the changes that occurred in the late medieval period. We shall be concerned here with a discussion of those forces with a view to understanding the special features of the process of change, the manner in which a comparatively insignificant clan of foreign descent acquired power and rose to the highest ranks of the governing élite, and also the forces that brought about its downfall. The question, “Why were the new élite unable to gain sovereign power when it was just within their grasp?” will engage our special attention.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 136 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bell, H. C. P., Report on the Kegalle District [RKD] (Sessional Paper XIX), Colombo, 1892, 77.Google Scholar

2 Archaeological survey of Ceylon: Annual Report, 1911, 122.

3 JRAS (CB), X, 34, 1887, 83–95; op. cit., XXII, 65, 1912, 360–2.

4 Epigraphia Zeylanica [EZ], IV, 90–110.

5 Ceylon Journal of Science, Section G, II, 1933, 188.Google Scholar

6 JRAS (CB), XXXII, 86, 1933, 271.Google Scholar

7 op. cit., 272.

8 JRAS (CB), XXII, 65, 1912, 362–363.Google Scholar

9 EZ, V, 464.

10 Bell, RKD, 78–9.

11 BM Or.6606 (165). This inscription is quoted in Mudiyanse, N., The art and architecture of the Gampola period, Colombo, [1965], 175–184.Google Scholar

12 JRAS (CB), XXII, 65, 1912, 364–365.Google Scholar

13 English tr., Colombo, 1900, 65.

14 Siri Laka kadayim pota, ed. C. de Silva, Colombo, [date unknown].

15 UHC, I, Pt. ii, 691–702; Paranavitana, S., “The Arya kingdom in north Ceylon”, JRAS (CB), N.S. VII, 1961, 172–224.Google Scholar

16 JRAS (CB), N.S. VII, 1961, 197–200.Google Scholar

17 EZ, V, 464.

18 JRAS (CB), N.S. VII, 1961, 197.Google Scholar

19 p. 293.

20 For further details of the Vanni settlements see Indrapala, K., Dravidian settlements in Ceylon and the beginnings of the kingdom of Jaffna, Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1965 (unpublished), 306 ff.Google Scholar

21 Pūjāvaliya, ed. Suravira, A. V., Colombo, 1961, 109Google Scholar; Rājāvaliya, 44, 65, 66; Nikāya saṅgrahaya, 20.

22 Daṁbadeṇi asna, ed. Ranasinha, D. C., Colombo, 1928Google Scholar; Vanni upata, BM Or.6606 (139); Mukkara haṭana, BM Or.6606 (53), Or.6606 (54), tr. in Raghavan, M. D., The Karava of Ceylon, Colombo, 1961, 16–23Google Scholar; Abhayasinha, P. M. P., Uḍaraṭa vitti, Maharagama, 1967.Google Scholar

23 Vanni upata, BM Or.6606 (139).

24 ibid.

25 K. Indrapala, op. cit., 368 ff.

26 Tambiah, H. W., The laws and customs of the Tamils of Jaffna, Colombo, 1954, 8–12Google Scholar; Brito, C., Mukkuva law, Colombo, 1872.Google Scholar

27 Menon, C. A., Cochin State manual, Ernakulam, 1911, 104Google Scholar; Sturrock, J., Manual of South Canara, I, Madras, 1894, 169–170.Google Scholar

28 Cūlavaṅsa, XC, 33.

29 See Gnanaprakasar, S., “Nallamapanna Vanniyan and the grant of a Mudaliyarship”, JRAS(CB), XXXIII, 89, 1936, 221–223Google Scholar. In a document dated A.D. 1781 and referred to in this article, the Vanni in Dutch times was divided into six parrus; “It was conquered by the (heathen) kings of Jaffna and made tributary by them, a position which has been maintained by the Portuguese” (Rykloff Van Goens).

30 JRAS (CB), X, 34, 1887, 83–95Google Scholar; JRAS (CB), XXII, 65, 1912, 360–362Google Scholar. The latter gives photographic reproductions from estampages, together with the text in Sinhalese.

31 Ceylon Journal of Science, Section G, II, 1933, 188.Google Scholar

32 Bell, RKD, 78–9. The text of the record is published in JRAS (CB), XXII, 65, 1912, 363.Google Scholar

33 op. cit., 25.

34 ed. Kosgoda Nanavimala Sthavira, Colombo, 1931, 292.

35 See also EZ, IV, 303 ff, where Paranavitana observes that the two families are not mentioned either in epigraphy or in literature before the 13th century. Gaṇaväsi is mentioned for the first time in Pūjāvaliya, ch. 34 (ed. Mabopitiye Medhamkara Thero, Colombo, 1932, 50). In the Daḻadā sirita members of the clan are given an important place in the ceremonial connected with the public exposition of the Tooth Relic. The Sagama Record (late 14th century) is the earliest inscriptional occurrence of the word. No Sinhalese king before the Gampola period claimed to belong to either of these two families. The Dīpavaṅsa, the Mahāvaṅsa, and the commentary to the latter make no reference to the princes who are said to have accompanied the Bō-tree. The Mahābodhi vaṅsa gives a detailed account of these princes, describing at length the offices conferred on them by king Devanampiya Tissa and where they settled down. But it makes no mention of the two families in question.

36 Saddharma ratnākaraya, 294.

37 ibid.

38 A contemporary poem, the Tisara sandesa (ed. Kumaratunga), v. 46, states that he carried out reconstruction work at this place, while maintaining the traditional proportions of the building.

39 As quoted in Lawrie, A. G., A gazetteer of the Central Province of Ceylon, II, Colombo, 1898, 753–754.Google Scholar

40 Ceylon Antiquary and Literary Register, I, 1916, 153.Google Scholar

41 JRAS (CB), XXXII, 86, 1933, 262Google Scholar; The Rehla of Ibn Batūta (tr. Hussain, M., Baroda, 1953), 247Google Scholar; JRAS (CB), VII, 1882, 39 ff.Google Scholar

42 UHC, I, Pt. II, 640.

43 ibid.

44 Paranavitana, S., “Alagakkōnāra Parapura”, in Sāhityaya, 1972 (Gampola Literary Festival Special Issue), 1.Google Scholar

45 JRAS (CE), XXII, 65, 1912, 352–353.Google Scholar

46 UHC, I, Pt. II, 641.

47 See Paranavitana, op. cit.

48 BM Or.6606 (165); Jayatilaka, D. B., Siṅhala sāhitya lipi, Colombo, 1940, 125.Google Scholar

49 p. 42.

50 Cūlavaṅsa, XCI, vv. 2 ff.

51 UHC, I, Pt. II, Appendix, 655–7.

52 Bell, RKD, 78–9; JRAS (CB), XXII, 65, 1912, 363.Google Scholar

53 ibid., 362–3.

54 Mayura sandesaya, ed. Swami, W. Dipankara, Colombo, 1910, v. 56.Google Scholar

Jayasak bō vāra tungu jaya nāda kara

Rupusaknā para gat gaja kesara yura

Mulusakvala nara yasa teda piri itira

Aḷagakkōnāra himi sanda dina mepura

Who many a time blew loud the conch of victory;

Who seized, as does a lion, the rival elephant hordes;

Whose fame and majesty filled the entire universe;

Aḷagakkōnāra, great lord! may you flourish in this city.

55 JRAS (CB), XXII, 65, 1912, 364–365Google Scholar; EZ, IV, 296–312.

56 ed. A. V. Suravira, Colombo, 1965, 1–3.

57 Hegel, , Philosophy of right (English tr., London, 1942), 295.Google Scholar

58 Carr, E. H., What is history? Harmondsworth, 1971, 54–55.Google Scholar

59 Saddharma ratnākaraya, 294; Nikāya saṅgrahaya, 24.

60 UHC, I, Pt. II, 650; Somaratna, G. P. V., Political history of the kingdom of Kōṭṭē, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1969 (unpublished), 113 ff.Google Scholar; Paranavitana, S., “Aḷagakkōnāra Parapura” in Sāhityaya, Colombo, 1972, 1 ff.Google Scholar

61 ibid.

62 Conquista temporal e espiritual de Ceylao, Colombo, 1916, 1, 23–24.Google Scholar

63 JRAS (CB), XXXII, 86, 1933, 297Google Scholar; see also, Paranavitana, EZ, IV, 300–4.

64 ed. W. Dipankara Sthavira, Colombo, 1910.

65 Yule, H., Cathay and the way thither, III, London, 1914, 231Google Scholar; JRAS (CB), XXXII, 86, 1933, 268.Google Scholar

66 JRAS (CB), VII, 25, 1882, 56Google Scholar; Ibn Baṭṭūṭa, tr. Gibb, H. A. R., London, 1929, 260.Google Scholar

67 For detailed information on this subject see Duyvendak, J. J. L., China's discovery of Africa, London, 1949Google Scholar; Pelliot, P., “Les grands voyages maritimes chinois au début du XVe siecle”, T‘oung Pao, XXV, 1933, 237–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Notes additionnelles sur Tcheng Houo et sur ses voyages”, T‘oung Pao, XXXI, 1935, 274–314; idem, “Encore à propos des voyages de Tcheng Houo”, T‘oung Pao, XXXII, 1936, 210–22; Duyvendak, J. J. L., “The true dates of maritime expeditions in the early fifteenth century”, T‘oung Pao, XXXIV, 1938, 341–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Willetts, W., “The maritime adventures of Great Eunuch Ho”, JSEAH, V, 2, 1934, 25–42Google Scholar; Ling-yeong, Ching, “Chinese maritime expansion, 1368–1644”, JOS Australia, II, 1965, 27–47Google Scholar. Also Yamamoto, P., “Cheng-Ho's expeditions to the South Sea under the Ming dynasty”, Toyo Gakuho, XXI, 3, 1934, 374–404, and XXI, 4, 1934, 506–56 (in Japanese).Google Scholar

68 Hall, D. G. E., A history of South East Asia, London, 1961, 181Google Scholar; Cady, J. F., Southeast Asia: Its historical development, New York, 1964, 155Google Scholar. A fuller discussion of the primary motives of the Chinese and a useful summary of their nautical expeditions is contained in Needham, J., Ling, Wang, and Gwei-Djen, Lu, Science and civilisation in China, IV, Pt. III, Cambridge, 1971, 477–528Google Scholar; for motives see especially p. 488.

69 See Paranavitana in EZ, IV, 108 n. 1; JRAS (CB), X, 34, 1887, 91Google Scholar; XXII, 65, 1912, 363; Pūjāvaliya, ed. Sthavira, Valane Dhammananda Nayaka, Colombo, 1913, 698Google Scholar; Attanagalu vaṃsaya, Colombo, 1925, 48.

70 p. 27.

71 ed. W. Pemananda Bhikkhu, Colombo, 2470/1926, 64.

72 ed. A. V. Suravira, Colombo, 1965, 1.

73 This is the meaning of such expressions as loka-sāsanābhivrddhiya sandahā, “for the welfare of society and religion”, and loka-sāsanopakārayehi niraturen tatparava, “ever concerned with the promotion of society and religion”, frequently occurring in Sinhalese writings.