Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:11:11.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki: an epic of ancient India. Volume VI: Yuddhakāṇḍa. Translated by Robert P. Goldman, Sally J. Sutherland Goldman, and Barend A. van Nooten. pp. xviii, 1655. Princeton, New Jersey and Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2009.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Simon Brodbeck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 556 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the Sanskrit text, see Vaidya, P. L., (ed.), The Yuddhakāṇḍa: the sixth book of the Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa, the national epic of India (Baroda, Oriental Institute, 1971, with full critical apparatus)Google Scholar; Vyas, R. T., (gen. ed.), Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa: text as constituted in its critical edition (Baroda, Oriental Institute, 1992)Google Scholar; www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rys/index.htm.

2 For example: Pollock 1971 (p. 4 fn. 4), R. Goldman 2003a (p. 37 fn. 46), R. Goldman 1978 (p. 83 fn. 183), Ramanujan 1992 (p. 112 fn. 44), and Biardeau 1999 (p. 115 fn. 47).

3 For grammatical details of the difference between ‘epic Sanskrit’ and Pāṇinian Sanskrit, see Oberlies, Thomas, A Grammar of Epic Sanskrit (Berlin, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 In addition to these comments, one cannot help but notice the use of unconventional orthography: as in previous volumes, the ‘ṅ’ in ‘Laṅkā’, ‘Aṅgada’, and so on is presented not as n-with-overdot but as n-with-macron, a character that I cannot find on any of my computer's extended character-sets.

5 Notwithstanding attempts to reconstruct versions that would hypothetically have predated the version the critical editors have reconstituted. See for example John and Brockington, Mary, translation, Rāma the Steadfast: an early form of the Rāmāyaṇa (London, 2006)Google Scholar.