Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:17:04.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peculiarities in the Use of Iti

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

A. Berriedale Keith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 1910 , pp. 1317 - 1321
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1317 note 1 VOJ., i, 16.

page 1317 note 2 Festgruss an Otto von Böhtlingk, pp. 62–7.

page 1317 note 3 ZDMG., xxxix, 484; xl, 145; xli, 516 seq.

page 1317 note 4 1892, pp. 195–8.

page 1318 note 1 Lanman, , Noun Inflection in the Veda, pp. 385, 394, 410Google Scholar.

page 1318 note 2 Hopkins, , Great Epic of India, p. 264Google Scholar, note; Michelson, , JAOS., xxv, 105Google Scholar.

page 1318 note 3 Śānkhāyana Āraṇyaka, p. 51, n. 6.

page 1318 note 4 See e.g. Böhtlingk, , Sächs. Ber., 1892, p. 196Google Scholar; Chrestomathie2, p. 356; Delbrück, , Synt. Forsch., v, 533Google Scholar.

page 1319 note 1 Delbrück (op. cit., v, 213, note) is uneasy as to this passage, hints at emendation. In the Kāṭhalca Saṃhitā, xi, 3, there is no yathā.

page 1319 note 2 Ibid., p. 533.

page 1319 note 3 Cf. a similar argument in Monro, , Homeric Grammar2, p. 239Google Scholar.

page 1320 note 1 Cf. Delbrück, op. cit., p. 596, for fut. with yathā.

page 1320 note 2 Here the iti is that following the whole sentence.

page 1321 note 1 JAOS., xxviii, 404. If the sense is “says of one”, the construction is regular, but the probabilities are strongly in favour of Hopkins' version. In some cases, however, “say of” is certain, e.g. Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa, xii, 4, 3, 8. Cf. also my Śāṅkhāyana Āraṇyaka, p. xv.