No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 122 note 1 I quote it from the ink-impression mentioned above.
page 122 note 2 Vikramāṅkadēvacharita, 3. 26–41: see Ind. Ant., vol. 5, p. 319.Google Scholar But the inscriptional evidence is not exactly in agreement with the alleged refusal: see Dyn. Kan. Distrs., p. 442, note 1.Google Scholar