No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Patna Congress and the “Man”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
Extract
The substance of the following was given in an address at the Oxford Congress of Orientalists, 1928. It makes no pretensions to do more than put forward a few suggestions concerning the so-called Third Buddhist Council—suggestions which may help when historians are reconsidering the miserably poor materials, which are all we have to throw light on what was the most momentous crisis and decision in the whole history of Buddhism.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1929
References
page 27 note 1 Indian Buddhism, p. 110.
page 27 note 2 Kathāvatthuly.
page 29 note 1 He repudiated a dual way of teaching.
page 29 note 2 Cf. Die Sekten des alten Buddhismus, by Walleser, M., 1927Google Scholar.
page 30 note 1 So Mhv. Buddhaghosa uses this and the traditional term “reciting”: sangīti.
page 31 note 1 As at the second “Council”.
page 31 note 2 Kindred Sayings, iv, Introduction.
page 31 note 3 Dīgha Summaries, M. ii, 29, S. and A.V.
page 32 note 1 Mahāparinibbāna Sta.
page 32 note 2 Upalabbhati. Comy.: “known.”
page 33 note 1 “Some only survive,” and “we don't know anyway” (“Eelwrigglers”), etc.
page 34 note 1 Majjhimai ii, 26.
page 35 note 1 E.g. Majjhima i, 295; Saṃayutta v, 218; iii, 2.