No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 135 note 1 JRAS. 1916, pp. 567–70.Google Scholar
page 135 note 2 xxiv, 15, 34 sq.
page 135 note 3 Orion, p. 30.Google Scholar
page 136 note 1 ZDMG. lxvi, 636.Google Scholar
page 136 note 2 JAOS. xxiv, 18, 19, 392, 393.Google Scholar
page 136 note 3 iii, 134. 17, etc.
page 136 note 4 x, 184. 3; daśamāsya, v, 78. 9.Google Scholar
page 136 note 5 AB. vii, 13. 9. In CU. v, 9. I there is a curious divergence of text; most read (with Böhtlingk) an alternation of ten months and yāvad vā; the Nirnaya Sagar ed. inserts “or nine”, which agrees with the Buddhist version of the period and Yājñ. iii, 83.
page 136 note 6 xii, 321. 117
page 137 note 1 i, 63. 61.
page 137 note 2 Windisch, , Buddha's Geburt, pp. 120 sq.Google Scholar
page 137 note 3 ŚB. xi, 1. 6. 2; the parallel with Prajāpati and xi, 5. 4. 6 disprove the rendering suggested.
page 137 note 4 AB. iv, 22.
page 137 note 5 Weber, , Naxatra, ii, 313.Google Scholar
page 137 note 6 Jolly, , Medicin, p. 53. 7 xii, 232. 13.Google Scholar
page 138 note 1 Arist. Hist. An. vii, 4, 584a 36 (7 and 10 months); fr. 258 (7, 8, 10, 11 months); Verg. Ecl. iv, 61; Plin. N.H. vii, 5. In Vendidād, v, 45Google Scholar, 10 months appears as the extreme period. In Wisdom, vii, 2Google Scholar, we have 10, in 2 Macc, vii, 27Google Scholar, however, 9 months.
page 138 note 2 König, , ZDMG. lx, 619.Google Scholar
page 138 note 3 vii, 50. 4.
page 138 note 4 AB. vi, 30.
page 138 note 5 JRAS. 1916, p. 569.Google Scholar
page 139 note 1 The evidence of borrowing adduced by Holtzmann (Das Mahābhārata im Osten und Westen, p. 67Google Scholar) is clearly inadequate to prove the relation.