Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:25:38.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the Excavations of 1919 at Muqayyar, el-‘Obeid, and Abu Shahrein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

It was before the Eoyal Asiatic Society that seventy years ago (on 8th July, 1854, to be precise) Mr. J. E. Taylor, H.B.M.'s Consul at Basrah in Turkey-in-Asia, read his paper on his excavations for the British Museum at Ur. Nearly a year later, on 5th May, 1855, after a further season's work in the land of the Muntefik, Mr. Taylor read his paper on Eridu and other sites in the neighbourhood. The first paper, “Notes on the Ruins of Mugeyer, by J. E. Taylor, Esq.,” will be found printed on p. 260 ff. of Vol. XV of the Journal, published in 1855; the second paper, “Notes on Abu Shahrein and Tel el Lahm,” on p. 404 ff. of the same volume. Both articles were illustrated by the quaint woodcuts of the time, in which first the draughtsman and then the engraver combined successively to deform the (originally probably rather poor) sketches or notes of the actual observer into something that can have borne but a faint resemblance to the original. One notices this in Taylor's sketch of the ziggurrat of Ur on p. 262, which is of the severely diagrammatic kind, as befits a learned publication. For the florid and romantic style of the period one may turn to the picture of the same ziggurrat opposite p. 129 of Loftus's “Travels and Researches in Chaldeæa and Susiana”, published three years later (reproduced in Plate XII, Fig. 1).

Type
Semitic, Sumerian, Hittite, and Egyptian Section
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 107 note 1 Journ. Eg. Arch., 1923, p. 178, n. 3. Cf. Archaologia, lxx, p. 106.

page 107 note 1 Archceologia, lxx, p. 124 ff.

page 110 note 1 Journ. Centr. Asian Soc., 1922, p. 125.

page 110 note 2 Archæologia, loc. cit., figs. 9–11.

page 111 note 1 R. Anthrop. Inst., occasional paper No. 6, 1924.

page 112 note 1 See Frankfort, loc. cit.

page 112 note 2 Most of this pottery was excavated by Major J. M. Wallis, 20th Deecan Horse, in a mound 1½ miles from Muhammadabad, district of Daregkej, N.E. Persia. “They were dug out from an alluvial layer, which was covered by many other layers, being of geological formation.” This is the information supplied by the finder. Some fragments are described as from Tuz.

page 113 note 1 Andersson, J. G., Palæontologia Sinica, ser., vol. i, “The Cave Deposit at Sha Kuo T'un in Fêng-tien,” “The Yang Shao Site in Honan” (Peking, 1923)Google Scholar, and “An Early Chinese Culture” (Bull. Geol. Surv. China, No. 5, 1923). Mr. Andersson compares his Honan pottery with that of Anau and that of Tripolje in Bosnia.

page 113 note 2 Proc. Soc. Bibl. Arch., xxxi, p. 311 ff.