Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:14:35.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on the name Kushan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 404 note 1 It must be remembered that we do not actually know that wang corresponds to šāh.

page 404 note 2 We may here note that Chavannes, , T'oung Pao, 1907, p. 191Google Scholar, translates the passage “he elected himself king; the name of his kingdom was Kuei-shuang”, and not “he used the dynastic title king of the Kuei-shuang”. It certainly can be translated “he used the dynastic title king of Kuei-shuang” as de Groot does. It is impossible to tell from the Chinese whether the name is of a people or their country.

page 404 note 3 Centralasiastische Studien I, in Sitz. Ber. d. Wien. Akad., 1887, vol. 87, pp. 155156Google Scholar; it is accepted by Marquart, , Ērānšahr, p. 36Google Scholar, note 5.

page 405 note 1 Gardner, , p. 206Google Scholar, No. 29 ff.

page 405 note 2 Cf. Justi, , Iranisches NamenbuchGoogle Scholar, s. v.

page 405 note 3 Cf. Latyschew, B., Inscriptions Orae Septentrionalis Ponti Euxeni, 1885Google Scholar, etc.; Indices.

page 405 note 4 Kuei-shuang-wang is, equally, “king of Kuei-shuang” and “king of the Kuei-shuang”.

page 405 note 5 Marquait, , op. cit., p. 208.Google Scholar

page 406 note 1 Some at least originally genitive plurals; e.g., Gīlān, of. Gelœ, Γλαι; but this was soon lost sight of; and it must be remembered that, when an Arab geographer talks of the he means “king of Gīlān” and not “king of the Gēls”.

page 406 note 2 Ed. Goeje, de, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 406 note 3 Ed. Wüstenfeld, , iv, p. 320, 1. 15.Google Scholar

page 407 note 1 СΥ is supposed to be genitive of a form sa, but the form , with ă, for , is of quite modern origin.

page 408 note 1 For Ζ = y, cf. ΚΟΖΟΛΑ = Kuyula, ΑΖΟΥ = Ayasa; = j, ΚΟΖΟΥΛΟ = Kujula; ΖΕΙΟΝΙЅΟΥ = Jihuniasa, and for ΟΟ = w, cf. ΟΟΗΜΑ = Wima.

page 409 note 1 A few have the form ΟΥΟΗΡΚΙ; ΟΟΗΡΚΕ is also found.

page 410 note 1 N.C., 1893, pl. xv, figs. 1, 2; p. 199.

page 411 note 1 Whitehead, , Cat. Coins in Punjab Museum, i, p. 156Google Scholar, n. 2.