No CrossRef data available.
page 117 note 1 See p. 118 below, n. 14.
page 117 note 2 I do not claim to give an exhaustive list of the places, and have, in fact, omitted a few names for which we have neither a reliable reading nor a photograph or a facsimile. Still less do I aim at giving all the references for them.
page 117 note 3 Ind. Ant., vol. 5, p. 16Google Scholar, line 25, = Pāli, Sanskṛit, and Old-Canarese Inscriptions, No. 154, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7 (Shimoga), Sk. 125.Google Scholar
page 117 note 4 Ind. Ant., vol. 4, p. 179Google Scholar, line 11–12, = PSOCI, No. 151,= Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 120.Google Scholar
page 117 note 5 Ind. Ant., vol. 10, p. 127Google Scholar, line 11: also PSOCI, No. 159, line 5, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 129.
page 117 note 6 PSOCI, No. 138, line 27, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11Google Scholar (Chitaldroog), Dg. 3: also ibid., Dg. 2, line 22–23.
page 117 note 7 PSOCI, No. 146, line 24, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Cd. 13.Google Scholar
page 118 note 1 JBBRAS, vol. 12, p. 12, line 14.Google Scholar
page 118 note 2 Epi. Carn., vol. 5 (Hassan), Bl. 116, line 18: and vol. 11, Dg. 36, line 80. The present name Haḷēbiḍ, lit. “old camp,” seems to preserve the memory of the ancient nele-vīḍu. A haḷeya-bīḍu is mentioned for “the capital Hiriya-Bētūr” in Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Dg. 6, line 17–18.
page 118 note 3 JBBRAS, vol. 11, p. 228Google Scholar, line 39–40; p. 241, line 34 (the dates of these two records are spurious: for the correct reading of the name and the identification of the place, see Ind. Ant., 1901, p. 262)Google Scholar: also Epi. Carn., vol. 5, Ak. 104, line 17.Google Scholar
page 118 note 4 PSOCI, No. 163, line 11, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 124; also PSOCI, No. 164, line 14–15, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 135: for the identification of the place see Ind. Ant., vol. 9, p. 50.Google Scholar
page 118 note 5 JBBRAS, vol. 9, p. 297, line 17.Google Scholar
page 118 note 6 JBBRAS, vol. 11, p. 247Google Scholar, line 5: also Epi. Carn., vol. 8 (Shimoga)Google Scholar, Sb. 549, line 8; vol. 11, Cd. 33, line 8; Cd. 34, line 5.
page 118 note 7 This nele-vīḍu is mentioned in many records: the earliest reference to it is in an unpublished inscription of a.d. 1054 at Kembhāvi, see Epi. Ind., vol. 12, p. 291Google Scholar; for other cases see, e.g., Epi. Ind., vol. 12, p. 283Google Scholar, line 210, and p. 330, line 9; also vol. 5, p. 24, line 10; also PSOCI, No. 175, line 22, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 137.
page 118 note 8 Epi. Ind., vol. 4, p. 213Google Scholar, line 11, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Mk. 29.
page 118 note 9 PSOCI, No. 200, line 50, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 105.
page 118 note 10 Ind. Ant., vol. 10, p. 252Google Scholar, line 31; for the correct reading of the name see the Errata.
page 118 note 11 Ind. Ant., vol. 19, p. 164Google Scholar, line 4: also PSOCI, No. 155, line 10, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 126: and PSOCI, No. 153, line 9, = Epi. Carn., vol. 7, Sk. 153 (where the name has been misread as Ghaṭṭadakee).
page 118 note 12 Ind. Ant., vol. 11, p. 273, line 19.Google Scholar
page 118 note 13 PSOCI, No. 146, line 11, = Epi. Carn., vol. 11, Cd. 13; also ibid., Dg. 4, line 14; Dg. 6, line 15.
page 118 note 14 From unpublished records: Vaḷavāḍa-sthira-śibirē occurs in Epi. Ind., vol. 3, p. 210Google Scholar, line 15; p. 212, line 11.
page 118 note 15 PSOCI, No. 18, plate iv b, line 6,= Epi. Carn., vol. 5, Bl. 71, line 163.
page 118 note 16 JBBRAS, vol. 10, p. 268, line 64.Google Scholar