Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:53:36.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monotheism the Zoroastrian Way

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2013

ALMUT HINTZE
ALMUT HINTZE*
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines seemingly monotheistic, polytheistic and dualistic features of Zoroastrianism from the point of view of the Zoroastrian creation myth. Exploring the personality of the principal deity, Ahura Mazdā, the origin of the spiritual and material worlds and the worship of the Yazatas, it is argued that Zoroastrianism has its own particular form of monotheism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 225 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, G. 1993. ‘Monotheismus’ – ‘Polytheismus’. Grenzen und Möglichkeiten einer Klassifikation von Gottesvorstellungen. In: Dietrich, M. & Loretz, O. (eds.), Mesopotamica – Ugaratica – Biblica. Festschrift für Kurt Bergerhof zur Vollendung seines 70. Lebensjahres am 7. Mai 1992. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Ahn, G. 2003. Monotheismus und Polytheismus als religionswissenschaftliche Kategorien? In: Oeming, M. & Schmid, K. (eds.), Der eine Gott und die Götter. Polytheismus und Monotheismus im antiken Israel (Abhandlungen zur Theologie des Alten und Neuen Testaments 82), Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Anklesaria, B.T. 1956. Zand-Ākāsīh. Iranian or Greater Bundahišn. Bombay: Rahnumae Mazdāyasnan Sabha.Google Scholar
Anklesaria, T.D. 1908. The Būndahishn: Being a Facsimile of the TD Manuscript No. 2 Brought from Persia by Dastur Tirandaz and Now Preserved in the Late Ervad Tahmuras’ Library. With an Introduction by B. T. Anklesaria. Bombay: British India Press.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. 2003. Die mosaische Unterscheidung, oder, Der Preis des Monotheismus, München: Carl Hanser-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, Chr. 1888. Beiträge zur altiranischen Grammatik V. Bezzenberger's Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen 13, pp. 54–93.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, Chr. 1904. Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Beekes, R.S.P. 1981. The neuter plural and the vocalization of the laryngeals in Avestan. Indo-Iranian Journal 23, pp. 275–287.Google Scholar
Bianchi, U. 1980. The Category of Dualism in the Historical Phenomenology of Religion. Temenos 16, pp. 10–25.Google Scholar
Boyd, J.W. & Crosby, D.A. 1979. Is Zoroastrianism Dualistic or Monotheistic? Journal of the American Academy of Religion 47, pp. 557–588.Google Scholar
Eichner, H. 2002. Indogermanische Seelenbegriffe. In: Figl, J. & Klein, H.-D. (eds.), Der Begriff der Seele in der Religionswissenschaft. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 131–141.Google Scholar
Filippone, E. 2003. The Mazdean notions of creation and birth: some reflexes in the Iranian languages. In: Cereti, C.G., Maggi, M. & Provasi, E. (eds.), Religious themes and texts of pre-Islamic Iran and Central Asia. Studies in honour of Professor Gherardo Gnoli. Wiesbaden: Reichert, pp. 91–109 (Beiträge zur Iranistik 24).Google Scholar
Geldner, K.F. 1889–1896. Avesta. The sacred books of the Parsis. 3 vols., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Gladigow, B. 1988. Religionsgeschichte des Gegenstandes – Gegenstände der Religionsgeschichte. In: Zinser, H. (ed.), Religionswissenschaft. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Reimer, pp. 6–37.Google Scholar
Gladigow, B. 1998. Polytheismus. In: Cancik, H., Gladigow, B. & Kohl, K.-H. (eds.), Handbuch religionswissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, Vol. 4, pp. 321–330.Google Scholar
Gladigow, B. 2002. Polytheismus und Monotheismus. In: Krebernik, M. & van Oorschot, J. (eds.), Polytheismus und Monotheismus in den Religionen des Vorderen Orients. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 3–20 (Alter Orient und Altes Testament, Bd. 298).Google Scholar
Gnoli, Gh. 1962. Un particolare aspetto del simbolismo della luce nel Mazdeismo e nel Manicheismo. Annali del Istituto Orientale di Napoli 12, pp. 95–128.Google Scholar
Gnoli, Gh. 1963. Osservazioni sulla dottrina Mazdāica della creazione. Annali del Istituto Orientale di Napoli 13, pp. 163–193.Google Scholar
Gnoli, Gh. 1994. Le religioni dell' Iran antico e Zoroastro. In: Filoramo, G. (ed.), Storia delle religioni, vol. I: Le religioni antiche. Roma & Bari: Laterza, pp. 455–498.Google Scholar
Gnoli, Gh. 1995. Einige Bemerkungen zum altiranischen Dualismus. In: Proceedings of the Second European Conference of Iranian Studies held in Bamberg, 30th September to 4th October 1991 by the Societas Iranologica Europaea. Roma, pp. 213–231.Google Scholar
Grenet, F. 2005. An Archaeologist's Approach to Avestan Geography. In: Curtis, V. Sarkosh & Stewart, Sarah (eds.), The Birth of the Persian Empire, Volume 1. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Hale, W.E. 1986. Ásura- in Early Vedic Religion. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Headland, T. N., Pike, K. & Harris, M. (eds.) 1990. Emics and etics: the insider/outsider debate. Newbury Park (Calf.), London, New Delhi: Sage Publications (Frontiers of Anthropology 7).Google Scholar
Herrenschmidt, C. 1987. Once upon a time, Zoroaster. History and Anthropology 3, pp. 209–237.Google Scholar
Herrenschmidt, C. & Kellens, J. 1993. *Daiva. In: Yarshater, E. (ed.), Encyclopedia Iranica 6, pp. 599–602.Google Scholar
Hintze, A. 2007. A Zoroastrian Liturgy. The Worship in Seven Chapters (Yasna 35–41). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz (Iranica 12).Google Scholar
Hintze, A. 2009. The Cow that Came from the Moon: The Avestan Expression māh- gaociϑra- . In: Altman Bromberg, C., Sims-Williams, N. & Sims-Williams, U. (eds.), Iranian and Zoroastrian Studies in Honor of Prods Oktor Skjærvø, Bulletin of the Asia Institute 19, 2005 [2009], pp. 58–66.Google Scholar
Hintze, A. 2013. Change and Continuity in the Zoroastrian Tradition. An Inaugural Lecture Delivered on 22 February 2012. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, K. 1975. Aufsätze zur Indoiranistik vol. II. Ed. by Narten, J.. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, K. & Forssman, B. 2004. Avestische Laut- und Formenlehre. 2., durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage, Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft (IBS 115).Google Scholar
Humbach, H. 1959. Die Gathas des Zarathustra. 2 vols., Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Humbach, H. 1991. The Gāthās of Zarathushtra and the Other Old Avestan Texts. In collaboration with Elfenbein, J. and Skjærvø, P.O.. 2 vols., Heidelberg: Winter (Indogermanische Bibliothek: Reihe 1, Lehr- und Handbücher).Google Scholar
Jackson, A.V.W. 1896–1904. Die iranische Religion. In: Geiger, W. & Kuhn, E. (eds.), Grundriss der iranischen Philologie. Vol. 2: Litteratur, Geschichte und Kultur. Strassburg: Trübner, pp. 612–708.Google Scholar
JamaspAsa, K.M. & Nawabi, M. 1976. The Manuscript D90, Yasnā with its Pahlavi Translation. 2 parts, Shiraz: Asia Institute of the Pahlavi University (The Pahlavi Codices and Iranian Researches vols. 19–20).Google Scholar
de Jong, A.F. 2003. Zoroastrian Self-Definition in Contact with Other Faiths. In: Shaked, Sh. and Netzer, A. (eds.), Irano-Judaica V. Studies Relating to Jewish Contacts with Persian Culture Throughout the Ages. Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute, pp. 16–26.Google Scholar
de Jong, A.F. 2004. Zoroastrian Religious Polemics and their Contexts: Interconfessional Contacts in the Sasanian Empire. In: Hettema, T.L. & van der Kooij, A. (eds.), Religious Polemics in Context. Papers presented to the Second International Conference of the Leiden Institute for the Study of Religions (LISOR) held at Leiden, 27–28 April 2000 (STAR 11). Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 48–63.Google Scholar
de Jong, A.F. 2010. Ahura Mazda the Creator. In: Curtis, J. & Simpson, St J. (eds.), The World of Achaemenid Persia - History, Art and Society in Iran and the Ancient Near East. London: IB Tauris, London, pp. 85–91.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. 1991. Zoroastre et l’Avesta ancien. Paris: Peeters ( = 2000, pp. 31–94).Google Scholar
Kellens, J. 1995. L’âme entre le cadavre et le paradis. Journal Asiatique 283, pp. 19–56.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. 2000. Essays on Zarathustra and Zoroastrianism. Translated and Edited by Prods Oktor Skjærvø. Costa Mesa: Mazdā Publishers.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. 2007. Études avestiques et mazdéennes vol. 2. Le Hōm Stōm et la zone des déclarations (Y 7.24–Y 15.4, avec les intercalations de Vr3 à 6). Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. 2012. Le panthéon mazdéen: dieux qui survivent et dieux qui naissent. Cours et travaux du Collège de France. Résumés 2010–2011. Annuaire 111e; année. Paris: Collège de France, pp. 471–488.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. 2012a. Le document des origines: l’Avesta. Religions & Histoire 44, 21–23.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. & Pirart, E. 1988–1991. Les Textes vieil-avestiques. 3 vols., Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Kellens, J. and Pirart, E. 1997. La strophe des jumeaux: stagnation, extravagance et autres méthodes d'approche. Journal Asiatique 285, pp. 31–72.Google Scholar
Kliever, L.D. 1979. Polysymbolism and Modern Religiosity. The Journal of Religion 59, pp. 169–194.Google Scholar
Knott, K. 2010. Insider/Outsider Perspectives. In: Hinnells, John R. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 259–273.Google Scholar
Kotwal, F.M.P. 1969. The Supplementary Texts to the Šāyest nē-Šāyest. København: Munksgaard (Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-filosofiske Meddelelser 44,2).Google Scholar
Kotwal, F.M. & Hintze, A. 2008. The Khorda Avesta and Yašt Codex E1. Facsimile Edition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz (Iranica 16).Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Ph.G. 1993. Cosmogony and Cosmology. I. In Zoroastrianism/Mazdāism. In: Yarshater, E. (ed.), Encyclopaedia Iranica 6, pp. 303–307.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Ph.G. 1993a. On Spenta Mainyu's Role in the Zoroastrian Cosmogony. In: Bromberg, C. (ed.), Iranian Studies in Honor of A.D.H. Bivar. Bulletin of the Asia Institute 7, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
Kreyenbroek, Ph.G. 2006. Theological questions in an oral tradition: the case of Zoroastrianism; in: Kratz, R. G. & Spickermann, H. (eds.), Götterbilder, Gottes-bilder, Weltbilder. Polytheismus und Monotheismus in der Antike. Band I: Ägypten, Mesopotamien, Persien, Kleinasien, Syrien, Palästina. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 199–222.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. 1997. Pahlavi kirrēnīdan: Traces of Iranian Creation Mythology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 117, pp. 681–685.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, M. 1986. Lautlehre (Segmentale Phonologie des Indogermanischen). Indogermanische Grammatik, vol. I.2, Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, M. 1986–2001. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen. 3 vols., Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, R.T. (ed.) 1999. The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Narten, J. 1982. Die Amə a Spəṇtas im Avesta. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Narten, J. 1986. Zarathustra und die Gottheiten des Alten Iran. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 56, pp. 61–89.Google Scholar
Panaino, A. 1994. Philologica Avestica IV. Av. yaštay-/yešti-; yašta- ; Phl. yašt. Studia Iranica 23, pp. 163–185.Google Scholar
Panaino, A. 2001. A few remarks on the Zoroastrian conception of the status of Aṇgra Mainyu and of the Daēvas. In: Démons et merveilles d'Orient. Res Orientales 13, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Panaino, A. 2002. The lists of names of Ahura Mazdā (Yašt I) and Vayu (Yašt XV). Roma: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente (Serie orientale Roma XCIV).Google Scholar
Panaino, A. 2002a. La concezione di Dio e degli altri dèi nella cultura religiosa dell’Iran antico. Credere oggi 22, n. 129, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
Panaino, A. 2004. Per una definizione possibile del «monoteismo» Mazdāico. Note e considerazioni comparative con i grandi monoteismi giudaico-cristiani. In: Perani, M. (ed.), L’interculturalità dell’ ebraismo. Ravenna: Longo editore, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Pettazzoni, R. 1920. La religione di Zarathustra nella storia religiosa dell’ Iran. Bologna: Nicola Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Pettazzoni, R. 1956. The all-knowing God; researches into early religion and culture. Authorized translation by H. J. Rose. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Pike, K. 1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. 2nd edition, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pirart, E. 1992. Les fragments vieil-avestiques du Y 58. Annali del Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli 52, pp. 225–247.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. 1985. Naissance des polythéismes (1624–1757). Archives des Sciences Sociales des Religions 59, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. 2000. Revelations, Theology and Poetics in the Gathas. Bulletin of the Asia Institute 14, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Shaked, Sh. 1967. Some notes on Ahreman, the evil spirit, and his creation. In: Studies in Mysticism and Religion presented to Gershom G. Scholem on his Seventieth Birthday by Pupils, Colleagues and Friends. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, pp. 227–234.Google Scholar
Shaked, Sh. 1971. The notions of mēnōg and gētīg in the Pahlavi Texts and their relation to eschatology. Acta Orientalia 33, pp. 59–107.Google Scholar
Shaked, Sh. 1979. The Wisdom of the Sasanian Sages (Dēnkard VI) by Aturpāt-i Ēmētān. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Shaked, Sh. 1994. Dualism in Transformation. Varieties of Religion in Sasanian Iran. London: SOAS (Jordan Lectures 1991).Google Scholar
Shaked, Sh. 2001. Gētīg and Mēnōg. In: Yarshater, E. (ed.), Encyclopaedia Iranica 10, pp. 574–576.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, N. 1985. The Christian Sogdian Manuscript C2. Berlin: Akademie Verlag (Berliner Turfantexte XII).Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 1995. Iranian Elements in Manicheism. A Comparative Contrastive Approach. Irano-Manichaica I. In: Gyselen, R. (ed.), Au carrefour des religions. Hommages à Philippe Gignoux. Bures-sur-Yvette: Groupe pour l’Étude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient; (Diffusion) Leuven: Peeters Press, pp. 263–284 (Res Orientales 7).Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 2002. Ahura Mazdā and Ārmaiti, Heaven and Earth, in the Old Avesta. JAOS 122, pp. 399–410.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 2002a. Praise and Blame in the Avesta: the poet-sacrificer and his duties. In: Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 26, pp. 29–67.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 2007. “The Legends” and “Appendix 1–3”, pp. 23–25 and 28–37 in M. Alram, M. Blet-Lemarquand & P.O. Skjærvø, “Shapur, King of Kings of Iranians and Non-Iranians.” In: Gyselen, R. (ed.), Des Indo-Grecs aux Sassanides: Données pour l’histoire et la géographie historique, Res Orientales 17, Bures-sur-Yvette: Groupe pour l’Étude de la Civilisation du Moyen-Orient, pp. 11–40.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 2009. OL’ News: ODs and Ends. In: Sundermann, W., Hintze, A. and de Blois, F. (eds.), Exegisti Monumenta. Festschrift in Honour of Nicholas Sims-Williams. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 479–495 (Iranica 17).Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 2011. Zoroastrian Dualism. In: Lange, A., Meyer, E.M., Reynolds, B.A. III, Styers, R. (eds.), Light Against Darkness. Dualism in Ancient Mediterranean Religion and the Contemporary World. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 55–91.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, P.O. 2011a. Zarathustra: A Revolutionary Monotheist? In: Pongratz-Leisten, B. (ed.), Reconsidering the Concept of Revolutionary Monotheism. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns, pp. 317–350.Google Scholar
Stausberg, M. 2002. Monotheismus, Polytheismus und Dualismus im alten Iran. In: Krebernik, Manfred & van Oorschot, Jürgen (eds.), Polytheismus und Monotheismus in den Religionen des Vorderen Orients. Ugarit-Verlag, Münster, pp. 91–111 (Alter Orient und Altes Testament, Bd. 298).Google Scholar
Tichy, E. 1985. Zur Vertretung interkonsonantischer Laryngale im Indoiranischen. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 45, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar
Tichy, E. 1986. Vedisch t van- und avestisch a auuan- . Die Sprache 32, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
Tremblay, X. 2003. La déclinaison des noms de parenté en -ter- en indo-européen. Innsbruck: Institute für Sprachwissenschaft (IBS 106).Google Scholar
Tremblay, X. 2006. Le pseudo-gâthique. Notes de lecture avestiques II. In: Panaino, A. & Piras, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the Societas Iranologica Europaea held in Ravenna, 6–11 October 2003. Milano: Mimesis, pp. 233–281.Google Scholar
Tremblay, X. 2007. Le Yasna 58 Fšuš Mąϑra haδaoxta. Annuaire 107ᵉ année, Collège de France, Paris, pp. 683–693.Google Scholar
Williams, A.V. 1985. A strange account of the world's origin: PRDd . XLVI. In: Papers in Honour of Professor Mary Boyce. Leiden: Brill, II pp. 683–697 (Hommages et Opera Minora, vol. XI).Google Scholar
Williams, A.V. 1990. The Pahlavi Rivāyat Accompanying the Dādestān ī Dēnīg. 2 Parts. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.Google Scholar
Williams, A.V. 2008. The Continuum of ‘Sacred Language’ From High to Low Speech in the Middle Iranian (Pahlavi) Zoroastrian Tradition. In: Green, N. & Searle-Chatterjee, M. (eds.), Religion, Language, and Power. New York & Abingdon, pp. 123–142.Google Scholar
Zaehner, R.C. 1961. The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Zeini, A. 2012. The Avestan manuscript Pt4_400 (Iranian Pahlavi Yasna) of the Bodleian Library (Avestan Digital Archive Series 31). Avestan Digital Archive. [email protected] Google Scholar