Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:16:25.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mongol News: The Akhbār-i Moghulān dar Anbāneh Qutb by Quṭb al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn Mas’ūd Shīrāzī

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2012

GEORGE LANE*
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of [email protected]

Abstract

The recent unearthing of this thirteenth century collection of notes pertaining to the political history of the early Ilkhanate has thrown some light on events and attitudes of that time. Though the manuscript was actually penned by Quṭb al-Dīn Shīrāzī of the Rasadkhana in Maragha, it is not certain that he was the author of the work. Rather than comprising one continuous narrative of events, the manuscript is a collection of notes and observations, occasionally detailed but other times very sketchy. However stamped with the seal of the Raba’ al-Rashidi there is evidence that this text was used selectively as a source for Rashīd al-Din's Jama’-ye Tavarikh. What is particularly interesting is that some of the events that are quoted in Rashid al-Dīn's chronicles are only partially reported and it is obvious that for whatever reasons parts of “Shīrāzī's” accounts are omitted in the re-telling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sayyed ʿAbd-Allāh Anwār, “Qoṭb-al-Din Širāzi”, Encyclopaedia Iranica, Online edn, 2005, <<http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/qotb-al-din-sirazi#x0023; >>

2 Ḵwāndamir (III, pp. 116–117), tr. Thackston, p. 65.

3 Ḥāfeẓ Ḥosayn Kerbelā’ī, vol. I, p. 324.

4 Ḥāfeẓ Ḥosayn Kerbelā’ī, vol. I, pp. 326–327.

5 Qāšāni, pp. 118–119; Ḥāfeẓ Ḥosayn, I, pp. 324, 331; Faṣiḥ Ḵᵛāfi, III, p. 18.

6 Khwandmir, p. 116; tr. Thackston, p. 66.

7 Shīrāzī, p. 20.

8 Shīrāzī, p. 22.

9 Shīrāzī, pp. 9–10.

10 Shīrāzī, p. 19.

11 See George Lane, “The Phoenix Mosque of Hangzhou 杭州凤凰寺” and A.H. Morton, “Muslim gravestones in the Phoenix Mosque in Hangzhou 杭州凤凰寺的穆斯林墓碑”, Qinghua Yuanshi 清華元氏, no.1, edn I, (2011).

12 Shīrāzī, p. 20.

13 Shīrāzī, p. 20.

14 Sa'di of Shiraz, tr. Francis Gladwin, intro & ed Kamal Haj Sayyed Javadi, The Gulistan or Rose Garden, al-Hoda, Tehran, 1379/2000, p. 14.

15 Shīrāzī, p. 20.

16 Shīrāzī, p. 20.

17 Shīrāzī, p. 21.

18 Shīrāzī, p. 22.

19 Collection of the Most Important Military Techniques” was a Chinese military compendium written in 1044 AD, by Zeng Gongliang (曾公亮), Ding Du (丁度), and Yang Weide (楊惟德).

20 See Stephen Haw, “Gunpowder and the Mongols”, JRAS forthcoming.

21 Juwayni, vol. III, p. 94; tr. Boyle, p. 609.

22 See Paul Buell, Soup for the Qan, p. 298.

23 Shīrāzī, p. 24.

24 Shīrāzī, pp. 22–23.

25 See Conrad, Lawrence I., “Ta'un and Waba’ – Conceptions of Plague and Pestilence in Early Islam”, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 25, No. 3 (1982), pp. 268307 Google Scholar.

26 Shīrāzī, p. 28.

27 Shīrāzī, p. 25.

28 Rashīd al-Dīn, p. 982, tr. Thackston, p. 481.

29 Shīrāzī, pp. 25–26.

30 Shīrāzī, p. 27.

31 Juwaynī, vol. III, pp. 253–260; pp. 707–712; Rashīd al-Dīn, pp. 981–983, tr. Thackston, pp. 481–482.

32 Shīrāzī, p. 28.

33 The Mongols’ hunt described by many including Juwaynī, vol. I, pp. 19–20; tr. Boyle, pp. 27–28; see Lane, George, Genghis Khan and Mongol Rule, (London, 2004), pp. 157161 Google Scholar.

34 Shīrāzī, p. 28.

35 Shīrāzī, p. 29.

36 Rashid al-Dīn, p. 1027; tr. Thackston, p. 503,.

37 Shīrāzī, p. 35.

38 Shīrāzī, p. 30.

39 Shīrāzī, p. 30.

40 Rashid al-Dīn, tr. Thackston, p. 493,.

41 Rashid al-Dīn, tr. Thackston, p. 496; Shīrāzī, p. 32.

42 See Chambers, James, The Devil's Horsemen, (London, 1979), p. 99 Google Scholar.

43 1 mann = 3 kilos approx.

44 Shīrāzī, p. 32.

45 Ibn Taqtaqani, al-Fakhri, tr. Whiting, p. 14.

46 Shīrāzī, p. 32.

47 Shīrāzī, p. 34.

48 Shīrāzī, p. 34.

49 Shīrāzī, p. 36.

50 Shīrāzī, pp. 36–37.

51 Shīrāzī, p. 37.

52 Shīrāzī, p. 37.

53 Shīrāzī, pp. 37–38.

54 Shīrāzī, p. 37.

55 Shīrāzī, p. 39.

56 Shīrāzī, pp. 39, 41.

57 Shīrāzī, p. 40.

58 Juwaynī, pp. 126–201; tr. Boyle, pp. 396–468.

59 Juwaynī, pp. 190–92; tr. Boyle, pp. 459–460.

60 Shīrāzī, p. 41.

61 Shīrāzī, p. 42.

62 Shīrāzī, p. 42.

63 Shīrāzī, p. 43.

64 Rashīd al-Dīn, pp. 1049–51; tr. Thackston, pp. 513–514,.

65 Rashīd al-Dīn, pp. 1101–1102; tr. Thackston, p. 537.

66 Shīrāzī, p. 48.

67 Hetoum, Glenn Burger (ed.), A Lytell Cronycle (London, 1988) p. 46 Google Scholar.

68 Shīrāzī, p. 49.

69 Shīrāzī, p. 49.

70 Shīrāzī, p. 49.

71 Mustawfī, 1999, p. 1289, 1292; tr. Ward, pp. 262, 269. Initially, Majd al-Mulk is mistakenly referred to as Majd al-Dīn. Hamdallah Mustawfi, (ed.) Mansurih Sharifzadih, Zafarnameh, vol. 10, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, (Tehran, 2009), p. 80, verse line 1213.

72 Shīrāzī, p. 50; Rashīd al-Dīn, p. 1115; Thackston, p. 544.

73 Shīrāzī, p. 50; Rashīd al-Dīn (bracketed), p. 1115; Thackston, p. 544.

74 Shīrāzī, p. 51(bracketed); Rashīd al-Dīn, p. 1114.

75 Shīrāzī, p. 51.

76 Shīrāzī, p. 51.

77 Shīrāzī, p. 51.

78 Shīrāzī, p. 52, “beh ḥājeb birūn raft va az sar karsī dar oftād va wafāt kard”.

79 Shīrāzī, p. 52.

80 Mustawfī, vol. II, p. 264.

81 Rashīd al-Dīn, tr. Thackston, p. 545.

82 Shīrāzī, p. 55.

83 Shīrāzī, p. 55.