Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:52:37.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mithridates and the Oracle of Hystaspes: Some dating issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2020

VICENTE DOBRORUKA
VICENTE DOBRORUKA*
Affiliation:
University of Brasilia, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dating of the so-called Oracle of Hystaspes or its Vorlage has for long been a major problem among scholars. This article attempts to articulate some issues present in the Oracle and similar or identical ones known to have been used in Mthridates’ VI Eupator propaganda. This can help not only dating the Oracle itself but also solve dating problems in Persian apocalyptic texts, whose dating may be pushed backwards.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 179 - 194
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anklesaria, Behramgore T. (ed.). Zand-Ākāsīh: Iranian or Greater Bundahišn. (Bombay, 1956).Google Scholar
Beck, Roger. A Brief History of Ancient Astrology. Blackwell. Electronic source, e-book, 2007.10.1002/9780470773772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Roger. The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire: Mysteries of the Unconquered Sun. (New York / Oxford, 2006).Google Scholar
Buresch, Karl. Klaros. Untersuchungen zum Orakelwesen des späteren Altertums, (Leipzig, 1889).Google Scholar
Causse, Antonin. “La propaganda juive et l'hellenisme” in: Révue d'Histoire et de Philosophie Religieuses 3, (1923), pp. 397–414.Google Scholar
Cereti, Carlo G. (ed.). The Zand i Wahman Yasn: a Zoroastrian Apocalypse, (Rome, 1995).Google Scholar
Chadwick, Robert. “Comets and meteors in the last Assyrian Empire” in: Aveni, Anthony F. (ed.). World Archaeoastronomy. Selected Papers from the 2nd Oxford International Conference on Archaeoastronomy held at Merida, Yucatan, Mexico 13–17th January 1986. (Cambridge, 1989), pp.186–194.Google Scholar
Cohn, Norman. Cosmos, Chaos and the World to Come. The Ancient Roots of Apocalyptic Faith, (New Haven / London, 1993).Google Scholar
Collins, John J. Studies in the Sibylline Oracles of Egyptian Judaism (Missoula, 1974).Google Scholar
Collins, John J. “Introduction to the Sibylline Oracles” in: Charlesworth, James H. (ed.). The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, Vol. 1 (New York, 1983–1985), pp. 897–902.Google Scholar
Cumont, Franz and Bidez, Joseph. Les mages hellénisés. Zoroastre, Ostanès et Hystaspe d'après la tradition grecque, (Paris, 2007).Google Scholar
Dittenberger, Wilhelm. Aktualisierende Konkordanzen zu Dittenbergers Orientis Graeci inscriptiones selectae (OGIS) und zur dritten Auflage der von ihm begründeten Sylloge inscriptionum graecarum (new edition by Gawantka, Wilfried), (Hildesheim / New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques. “Apocalypse juive et apocalypse iranienne” in Bianchi, Ugo and Vermaseren, Maarten J.. La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell'Impero romano: atti del Colloquio internazionale su la soteriologia dei culti orientali nell'Impero romano, Roma, 24–28 settembre 1979, (Leiden, 1982), pp.753–761.Google Scholar
Duff, Jeremy. A Reconsideration of Pseudepigraphy in Early Christianity. DPhil thesis. Theology Faculty University of Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
Eddy, Samuel K. The King is Dead. Studies in the Near Eastern Resistance to Hellenism 334–31 B.C. (Lincoln, 1961).Google Scholar
Erciyas, Deniz B. Wealth, Aristocracy and Royal Propaganda under the Hellenistic Kingdom of the Mithradatids in the Central Black Sea Region of Turkey, (Leiden, 2006).10.1163/9789047417842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flusser, David. “Hystaspes and John of Patmos” in: Judaism and the Origins of Christianity, (Jerusalem, 1988).Google Scholar
Fuchs, Harald. Der geistige Widerstand gegen Rom in der antiken Welt, (Berlin, 1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgi, Dieter. “Forms of religious propaganda” in: Schultz, Hans-Jürgen (ed.). Jesus in His Time, (Philadelphia, 1971), pp.124–131.Google Scholar
Goodman, Martin. A classe dirigente da Judéia. As origens da revolta judaica contra Roma, 66–70 d.C. (Rio de Janeiro, 1994).Google Scholar
Gurzadyan, Vahe G. and Vardanyan, Ruben. “Halley's comet of 87 BC on the coins of Armenian king Tigranes?” in: Astronomy & Geophysics 45 (4:6), (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinnells, John R. “A study of the oracle of Hystaspes” in: Sharpe, Eric J. and Hinnells, John R.. (eds.). Man and his Salvation: Studies in Memory of S.G.F.Brandon, (Manchester, 1973), pp.125–148.Google Scholar
Hultgård, Anders. “Figures messianiques d'Orient comme sauveurs universels dans le monde gréco-romain” in: Bianchi, Ugo and Vermaseren, Maarten J.. La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell'Impero romano: atti del Colloquio internazionale su la soteriologia dei culti orientali nell'Impero romano, Roma, 24–28 settembre 1979. (Leiden, 1982), pp.734–752.Google Scholar
Hultgård, Anders. “Forms and origins of Iranian apocalypticism” in: Hellholm, Daniel (ed.). Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Apocalypticism, Uppsala, August 12–17, 1979, (Tübingen, 1983), pp. 387–411.Google Scholar
Hunger, Hermann, “Stars, cities and predictions” in Burnett, Charles et al. (eds.). Studies in the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of David Pingree, (Leiden / Boston, 2004), pp. 16–32.Google Scholar
Jong, Albert de, Traditions of the Magi: Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin Literature, (Leiden, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Günther, “Der Synkretismus als Theologisches Problem” in Rekonstruktion und Interpretation, (Munich, 1969), pp. 40–82.Google Scholar
Kocsis, Elemér, “Ost-West Gegensatz in den Jüdischen Sibyllinen” in Novum Testamentum 5 ,2/3, (1962), pp. 105–110.Google Scholar
Kurfess, Alfons. Sibyllinische Weissagungen, (Munich, 1951).10.1515/9783110358551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, David N., “Zoroastrian astrology in the Bundahishn” in Cereti, Carlo G. and Paul, Ludwig (eds.). Iranica Diversa. Roma: Istituto italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente, (1999). MB 7-10.Google Scholar
Mayor, Adrienne. The Poison King: the Life and Legend of Mithridates, Rome's Deadliest Enemy, (Princeton / Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Meade, David G. Pseudonymity and Canon: an Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition, (Grand Rapids, 1987).Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce, “Considerations of methodology in the study of the mystery religions and early Christianty” in Harvard Theological Review 48,(1955), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Stephen. Anatolia: Land, Men, and Gods in Asia Minor, (Oxford, 1995) (2 vols.).Google Scholar
Molé, Marijan. La légende de Zoroastre: selon les textes Pehlevis (Paris, 1967).Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo, “The fault of the Greeks” in: Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. (Middletown, 1987), pp.9–35.Google Scholar
Olsson, Tord. “The apocalyptic activity. The case of Jāmāsp Nāmag” in Hellholm, Daniel (ed.). Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Apocalypticism, Uppsala, August 12–17, 1979 (Tübingen, 1983), pp. 21–50.Google Scholar
Panaino, Antonio. Tištrya. Roma: Istituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, (1990–1995).Google Scholar
Parpola, Simo. “Mesopotamian astrology and astronomy as domains of the Mespotamian ‘wisdom’” in: Galter, Hannes D. (ed.). Beiträge zum 3. Grazer Morgenländischen Symposion (23.-27. September 1991), Bundesministeriums für Wissenschaft und Forschung der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung der Landeshaupt (Graz, 1993), pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
Ramsey, John T. “A catalogue of Greco-Roman comets from 500 B.C. to A.D. 400” in: Journal for the History of Astronomy, 38, 131, (2007), pp. 175–197.10.1177/002182860703800203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, Theodore. Mithridate Eupator, roi de Pont, (Paris, 1890).Google Scholar
Rose, Herbert J. Concerning Parallels. Frazer Lecture, (Oxford, 1934).Google Scholar
Sanford, Eva. “Contrasting views of the Roman Empire” in: American Journal of Philology 58, (1937), pp. 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Eva. “Roman Avarice in Asia” in: Journal of Near Eastern Studies 9, (1950), pp. 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Francis R. et al. “Records of Halley's comet on Babylonian tablets” in: Nature 314, 18, (1985), pp. 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Barry. The Spartacus War, (New York, 2009).Google Scholar
Torm, Frederik. “Die Psychologie der Pseudonimität im Hinblick auf die Literatur des Urchristentums” in: Brox, Norbert (ed.). Pseudepigraphie in der Heidnischen und Jüdisch-Christlichen Antike. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, (1977).Google Scholar
Walker, Christopher B. F. “Halley's comet in Babylonia” in Nature 314, 18, (1985), pp. 576–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martin. “Darius’ ascent to Paradise” in: Indo-Iranian Journal 45:51–57, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windisch, Hans. Die Orakel des Hystaspes. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, (1929).Google Scholar
Yoke, Ho Peng. “Ancient and mediaeval observations of comets and novae in Chinese sources” in Vistas in Astronomy, 6,(1962), pp. 127–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar