Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:46:36.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Iranian Studies: Proceedings of the international symposium organized by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven from the 17th to the 20th of May 1982. Edited by W. Skalmowski and A. van Tongerloo. (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 16). pp. xiii, 336. Leuven. Uitgeverij Peeters, 1984. 2400 FB.

Review products

Middle Iranian Studies: Proceedings of the international symposium organized by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven from the 17th to the 20th of May 1982. Edited by W. Skalmowski and A. van Tongerloo. (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 16). pp. xiii, 336. Leuven. Uitgeverij Peeters, 1984. 2400 FB.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

François de Blois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews of Books
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 72 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the history of concept and word see Diels's, H. classic monograph Elementum, Leipzig, 1899;Google Scholar for more recent studies see the bibliography in Delling's, G. article in Kittel, G. et al. , Theologisches Worterbuch zum neuen Testament. Interestingly,Google ScholarLagercrantz, O., in his monograph “Elementum, eine lexikologische Studie”, Skrifter utgifna af kungl. humanistiska vetenskaps-samfundet i Uppsala, XI (1), 1906,Google Scholar argues, against Diels, that did, in certain contexts, have the meaning “Säule”, but his arguments have not met with the approval of classicists.