No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 266 note 1 Quoted by Rhys Davids in his article on Buddhaghosa in the Encyclopœdia of Religion and Ethics.
page 266 note 2 Oldenberg, Vinaya, iii, 314.
page 266 note 3 Burlingame in Buddhist Legends, p. 58 (Harvard Oriental Series), comes to the conclusion that Buddhaghosa is not the author of these two works.
page 267 note 1 Vol. i, part 2.
page 267 note 2 I-tsing, Records of Buddhist Religion, 217.
page 267 note 3 JRAS., 1896, pp. 416 f.
page 267 note 4 Visuddhimagga, 384.
page 268 note 1 Expositor (Pali Text Society, Translation Series), 122.
page 268 note 2 Visuddhimagga, 525.
page 268 note 3 Anguttara Nikāya, v, 113.
page 268 note 4 Visuddhimagga, 578.
page 268 note 5 Ibid. 596; Expositor, 370.
page 268 note 6 Expositor, 81.
page 268 note 7 Ibid. 186.
page 268 note 8 Paramatthajotikā, ii, 2, 581.
page 269 note 1 Manoratthapūraṇī, 58, Ceylon edition.
page 269 note 2 Mr.Law, B. C. in “A Note on Buddhaghosa's Commentaries,” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, xv, 1909, pp. 107 f., has thrown out suggestions which point to the same conclusion.Google Scholar