No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
This official designation, belonging to Seleucid and Ptolemaic times, is not a quantity that we should expect to see expressed in Indian letters; but to find it a second time is more than surprising, and it may be termed significant, more especially as both occurrences belong to the limited range of Kharoṣṭhī inscriptions.
page 284 note 1 If, after all, ye should be a relative and the reading should be prethave[ṃ]ti (pratiṣṭhāpayanti), the translation would be “Loota and his sister”. This, however, I feel to be less probable.