Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T13:48:43.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Islamic gold sandwich glass: some fragments in the David Collection, Copenhagen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Marian Wenzel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sandwich glass is the product of a technique practised from antiquity. Essentially, decoration is achieved by laying gold to a glass surface, patterning this gold in various ways, and then adding a second layer of glass to encapsulate the gold pattern. The technique seems to have been employed only rarely by craftsmen in Islamic areas; certainly surviving examples are rare.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 120 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 45 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Washington, Smithsonian Institution, Freer Gallery of Art 43.1, formerly in the Kevorkian Collection. Et. Combe, Sauvaget, J., Wiet, G., Répertoire chronologique d'épigraphie arabe, Vol. V, Cairo, 1934, p. 127,Google Scholar no. 1877. Sourdel-Thomine, Janine, Spuler, Bertold, Die Kunst des Islam, Berlin, 1973, p. 239,Google Scholar no. XXVIII. Atil, Esin, Chase, W. T., Paul Jett, Islamic Metalwork in the Freer Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. 1985, p. 266.Google Scholar Whilst the ewer is felt by the last writer to lack a clear provenance and date, it is widely accepted as Buyid and from the time of the Amir mentioned in its inscription (Bakhtiyār ibn Mu'izz al-Daula who ruled in Iraq from A.D. 967–977), in the manner cited by Grube, Ernst J., The World of Islam, London, 1966, p. 20, fig. 5.Google Scholar

2 “Recent important acquisitions made by public and private collections in the United States and abroad”, Journal of Glass Studies 7, Corning, New York, 1965, pp. 122–3.Google Scholar

3 Pinder-Wilson, R. H., Scanlon, George T., “Glass Finds from Fustat: 1964–71”, Journal of Glass Studies 15, 1973, pp. 28, 29.Google Scholar

4 Fukai, Shinji, Persian Glass, New York, Tokyo, Kyoto, 1977, p. 63, Pl. 71.Google Scholar

5 Pinder-Wilson, R. H., “Glass”, in the Arts of Islam (Exhibition catalogue, The Arts Council of Great Britain, Hayward Gallery London), London, 1976, pp. 137–8, cat. nos. 122, 125.Google Scholar

6 Honey, W. B., Glass. A handbook for the study of glass of all periods, and a guide to the Museum collections, London, 1946, p. 34,Google Scholar mentions the fragment as having been found in Egypt. Here he relies on the fact that many of the pieces of the Myers collection, to which this fragment once belonged, were obtained in Egypt. However, the group of fifty-two glass fragments including this piece (inventoried under 363–1900) are given no actual provenance in the Victoria and Albert Museum catalogue.

7 Lane, A., “Medieval finds at al-Mina in north Syria”, Archaeologia LXXXVII, 1938, p. 71.Google Scholar

8 Rogers, Michael, British Museum Inventory note for 1978, 10–112.Google Scholar

9 Sawyer, Charles H., Grabar, Oleg, Sasanian Silver, Late Antique and Early Mediaeval Arts of Luxury from Iran (Exhibition catalogue, The University of Michigan Museum of Art) Ann Arbor, 1967, pp. 152–3, no. 75.Google Scholar

10 Marschak, Boris, Silberschätze des Orients, Leipzig, 1986, Pls. 22, 23, p. 429:Google Scholar first half of the VIIth century; Pls. 55, 56, p. 430, end of the VIIth, beginning of the VIIIth century.

11 Gold sandwich glass tiles, made in much the same technique as was used for gold mosaic tesserae but with simple geometric decoration, were excavated at the Syrian locality of Maaret al-Nu'man, north of Hama; these are not unlike others found in and around Syria from various localities which flourished between the IXth and XIIth centuries. Philippe, Joseph, Le Monde byzantin dans Vhistoire de la verrerie, Bologna, 1970, pp. 54–57.Google Scholar Gold sandwich glass tiles of a different sort, from around the IXth century, have been found at Samarra and elsewhere. This type has an undecorated layer of gold sandwiched between clear glass the top layer of which is moulded into small rectangles. Lamm, Carl Johan, Das Glas von Samarra, Berlin 1928, p. 118,Google Scholar Fig. 66, no. 398. A similar fragment from Egypt is in the Ashmolean Museum; inventory no. 1913, 160; unpublished.

12 Gray, Basil, “Gold painted glass under the Seljuks”, Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale di Arte Turca, Naples 1965, pp. 143–5,Google Scholar figs. 1, 2; Pinder-Wilson, R. H. in Masterpieces of Glass (Exhibition catalogue, The British Museum), London 1968, p. 113, no. 151.Google Scholar

13 Safadi, Yasin Hamid, Islamic Calligraphy, London 1978, pp. 10, 40, 41, figs. 14, 15.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 40. Lings, Martin, Safadi, Yasin, The Qur'ān (Exhibition catalogue, The British Museum), London, 1976, p. 20,Google Scholar no. 4. I am grateful to R. H. Pinder-Wilson for his advice concerning Islamic calligraphy, and for his consideration of these passages.

15 Lings, Martin, Islamic Calligraphy and Illumination, London 1970, p. 4, no. 2.Google Scholar

16 Lings, Martin, The Quranic Art of Calligraphy and Illumination, London 1976, p. 18, Pl. 5.Google Scholar

17 Safadi, Yasin, Islamic Calligraphy, London 1978, pp. 13, 14.Google Scholar

18 Lings, Martin, op. cit.; p. 18.Google Scholar

19 I am grateful to Yasin Safadi for helpful consideration of several points in connection with this article.

20 Talbot-Rice, Tamara, Ancient Arts of Central Asia, London, 1965, p. 24, fig. 14.Google ScholarJavakhishvili, Alexander, “Jewellery and metalwork in pre-Christian Georgia,” in Javakhishvili, A. and Abramishvili, G., Jewellery and Metalwork in the Museums of Georgia, Leningrad 1986, p. 22, pl. 57.Google Scholar

21 Kent, J. P. C., Painter, K. S., Wealth of the Roman World (Exhibition catalogue, The British Museum) London, 1977, p. 148, no. 311.Google Scholar

22 Volov, Lisa, “Plaited Kufic on Saminid epigraphic pottery”, Ars Orientalis VI, 1966, pp. 108,Google Scholar 129, fig. 5, pl. VI. I was grateful to Nicholas Lowick for bringing this article to my attention, shortly before his untimely death.

23 Wilkinson, C. K., Nishapur. Pottery of the Early Islamic Period, New York, 1973, pp. 191, 192, nos. 46a, 46b.Google Scholar

24 Von Folsach, Kjeld, “Islamic art or art from the world of Islam”, Louisiana Revy (Exhibition catalogue, Louisiana, Copenhagen) Vol. 27, no. 3, Copenhagen, 1987, p. 15, Cat. no. 38, p. 71. Catalogue entry by Oliver Watson.Google Scholar

25 Erdmann, Kurt, “‘Fatimid’ rock crystals”, Oriental Art III, 1951, p. 143,Google Scholar fig. 1. Pinder- Wilson, R. H., “Rock crystal and jade”, in The Arts of Islam (Exhibition catalogue, The Arts Council of Great Britain, Hayward Gallery London), London, 1976, pp. 119–128, nos. 102, 106, 109.Google ScholarAlcouffe, Daniel, “La glyptique musulmane” in Le trisor de Saint-Marc de Venise (Exhibition catalogue, Grand Palais) Paris, 1984, pp. 217–225.Google ScholarOliver, Prudence, “Islamic relief cut glass, a suggested chronology”, Journal of Glass Studies III–IV, 1961–1962, pp. 12–29.Google ScholarJenkins, Marilyn, “Islamic glass, a brief history”, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, XLIV, no. 2, Fall 1986, pp. 12–29.Google Scholar

26 Lamm, Carl Johan, Mittelalterliche Glaser und Steinschnittarbeiten aus dem nahen Osten, Berlin 1925, Vol. II, pl. 77, nos. 6,8.Google Scholar

27 See note 1; also see Grube, Ernst J., The World of Islam, London 1966, pp. 20, 21, fig. 5.Google Scholar

28 Moravcsik, Gyula, Byzantium and the Magyars, Amsterdam, 1970, pp. 47, 49, 59.Google Scholar

29 Mihalik, Sàndor, Dienes, Istvan, etc. Madjarsko zlatarstva od X do XIX veka (Hungarian goldsmithery from the Xth to the XlXth century), (Exhibition catalogue, Muzej primenjene umetnosti, Belgrade 1968), pp. 5–15.Google ScholarKolba, Judit, Németh, Annamària, Treasures of Hungary: Gold and Silver from the Ninth to the Nineteenth century (Exhibition catalogue, Cooper- Hewitt Museum and the Smithsonian Institution Travelling Exhibition Service), Budapest 1986, pp. 6, 13, 14.Google ScholarBenda, Klement, Ornament and Jewellery, Archaeological Finds from Eastern Europe, Prague 1967, pp. 16, 17, pl. 41.Google Scholar

30 British Library Additional MS 39602, fol. 111. Spatherakis, Ioannis, Corpus of Dated Illuminated Greek Manuscripts to the year 1453, Vol. I, p. 4, no. 21, Vol. II, pl. 47.Google Scholar

31 Stockholm, , Statens Historiska Museum, SHM 9154.Google ScholarBackhouse, Janet, Turner, D. H., Webster, Leslie, The Golden Age of Anglo-Saxon Art 966–1066 (Exhibition catalogue, the British Museum), London, 1984, p. 36, Cat. no. 17.Google Scholar

32 The Benedictional of St. Aethelwold, British Library, Additional MS 49598. Temple, Elzbieta, Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts 900–1066, London 1976, Cat. 23, pp. 49–53.Google ScholarBackhouse, , Turner, , Webster, , op. cit., London 1984, p. 59, no. 37.Google Scholar

33 The Anglo-Saxon illustrated Hexateuch, British Library, Cotton MS. Claudius B. IV. Temple, , op. cit., pp. 102–104Google Scholar, Cat. no. 86. Backhouse, , Turner, , Webster, , op. cit., p. 153,Google Scholar Cat. no. 157, colour plate XXX.

34 Gospel book fragment, London, College of Arms MS. Arundel 22. Temple, , op. cit., pp. 54,Google Scholar 55, Cat. no. 26, colour plate 21. Backhouse, , Turner, , op. cit., p. 59,Google Scholar Cat. no. 38, colour plate VII.

35 Caiger-Smith, Alan, Lustre Pottery, Technique, tradition and innovation in Islam and the Western World, London, 1985, pp. 31–36,Google Scholar suggests that the IXth–IXth century fascination with an all-over-gold effect stems from a wish to evoke “the supreme statue of a ruler, of the court where the riches of the world were gathered in one place, and of the heavenly powers without whose help the court could not have come to be.” Yasin Safadi has commented to me on the identification of gold with the sun as a symbol of God which was popular at this time. The gold letters and solar rosettes in contemporary manuscripts reinforce this idea, while the colour blue, used for the enamel dots on the David Collection fragments, carried a related symbolism.