Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:18:03.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Notes on Baburiana I. The Identity of the “Bukhārā Bābur-nāma” II. Paternal Counsels attributed to Bābur in a Bhopal MS. [Dec. 1922].

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Annette S. Beveridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The full story of the Turki book on which, in Kehr's Codex, Ilminski based his Bābur-nāma (1857) is a very comedy of blameless error and mischance, primarily due to textual poverty; it has yet to be told but is too long for admission in the Journal; hence the purpose of this article is restricted to showing, on the evidence of its colophon and contents, that it is not the Bābur-nāma proper it passed for in Europe from 1725 to 1903, but is a work of independent authorship, plan, and date.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1923 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 75 note 1 For economy of space reference is asked to the Bahur-nama in English and to my earlier Notes (JRAS. 1900–2–5–6–7–8(ii)–9).

page 77 note 1 Perhaps the order of the Senkovski Bābur-nāma varies from Kehr's; nothing valid leads to this surmise however.