Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:00:47.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Empire of Tamerlane as an Adaptation of the Mongol Empire: An answer to David Morgan, “The Empire of Tamerlane: An Unsuccessful Re-Run of the Mongol State?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

BEATRICE F. MANZ
BEATRICE F. MANZ*
Affiliation:
Tufts [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I write this article in the spirit of the Persian poetic tradition, in which an answer to an earlier work takes off from the original and charts its own course. I will suggest that Tamerlane's recreation of the Mongol Empire was symbolic, and was part of his successful creation of a regional state which was at once Turco-Mongolian and Perso-Islamic. His experiment was continued and elaborated by his successors, and the resulting state provided a highly useful model for later dynasties in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Through my long engagement with Mongols and Turks, David Morgan's influence and aid have been a constant advantage and his friendship a recurring pleasure. Our acquaintance began in 1987 with a kind letter he sent me after reading the manuscript for The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane for the Cambridge University Press. Since then I have profited from his scholarship, have used his two books to teach generations of students, and have called on him for uncountable letters of recommendation, always generously given. I also want to thank David for asking me to write the Mongol chapter for the New Cambridge History of Islam, and thus attracting me into the Mongol period. It may seem odd to express my gratitude by writing an answer to David's article which is not entirely in agreement with his conclusions. I trust in the well-known openness of his mind and assume that he will take this in the spirit in which it is offered, as the continuation of many years of discussion.

Type
Part IV: Beyond the Empire
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 26 , Issue 1-2 , January 2016 , pp. 281 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Minhāj al-Dīn ‛Umar Jūzjānī, Ṭabaqāt-i Nāṣirī, (ed.) ‛Abd al-Ḥayy Ḥabībī (Kabul, 1343/1964), II, 144-145; translated by H.G. Raverty, Ṭabaḳāt-i Nāṣirī: A General History of the Muḥammadan Dynasties of Asia, including Hindustan, from A.H. 194 [810 A.D.] to A.H. 658 [1260 A.D,] and the Irruption of the Infidel Mughals into Islām, Biblioteca Indica 78 (London, 1881), pp. 1077-1079.

2 al-Athīr, Ibn, The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athīr for the Crusading Period from al-Kāmil fī’l-ta'rīkh, translated by Richards, D.S. (Aldershot, 2006-8), III, pp. 204 Google Scholar, 208, 307.

3 Kennedy, Hugh, The Early Abbasid Caliphate: A Political History (London and Totowa, NJ, 1981), pp. 87–90 Google Scholar.

4 See DeWeese, Devin, “Islamization in the Mongol Empire”, in Cosmo, Nicola Di, Frank, Allen J. and Golden, Peter B. (eds), The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: the Chinggisid Age (Cambridge, 2009), pp. 120–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Aṭā, ‛Alā’ al-Dīn Juwaynī, Malik, The History of the World-Conqueror, translated by Boyle, John Andrew (Manchester, 1958), pp. 40 Google Scholar, 204-206, 272.

6 Morgan, David, “The ‘Great Yasa of Chinggis Khan’ revisited”, in Amitai, Reuven and Biran, Michal (eds), Mongols, Turks, and Others: Eurasian Nomads and the Sedentary World (Leiden, 2005), pp. 297–304 Google Scholar.

7 DeWeese, “Islamization in the Mongol Empire”, passim.

8 See Aubin, Jean, Émirs mongols et vizirs persans dans les remous de l'acculturation, Studia Iranica. Cahier 15 (Paris, 1995)Google Scholar.

9 , Rashīd al-Dīn, Rashiduddin Fazlullah's Jami‛u't-tawarikh: A Compendium of Chronicles, translated by Thackston, W.M. (Cambridge, MA, 1998-9), pp. 708–709 Google Scholar, 714-718, 735-736, 740.

10 See, for example, Morgan, “The ‘Great Yasa of Chinggis Khan’ revisited”, pp. 305-307; Ayalon, David, “The Great Yāsa of Chingiz Khān: A Re-examination. A”, Studia Islamica 33 (1971), pp. 105–108 Google Scholar.

11 The mythologising of Chinggis Khan is well described in Michal Biran, Chinggis Khan (Oxford, 2007), pp. 118-121.

12 See, for example, Ayalon, “Great Yāsa. A”, pp. 176-177. One of the characteristics that Juwaynī ascribes to the descendants of Tolui to justify their accession to power is their strict adherence to the yasa, contrasted to infringements by other houses: Juwaynī, World Conqueror, pp. 243-244, 551-552.

13 Aubin, Jean, “Le quriltai de Sultân-Maydân (1336)”, Journal Asiatique 279 (1991), pp. 175–191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Wing, Patrick, “The Jalayirids and Dynastic State Formation in the Mongol Ilkhanate”, doctoral dissertation (University of Chicago, 2007), pp. 168–169 Google Scholar.

15 Fragner, Bert, “Ilkhanid Rule and its Contributions to Iranian Political Culture”, in Komaroff, Linda (ed.), Beyond the Legacy of Genghis Khan (Leiden, 2006), pp. 71–73 Google Scholar.

16 Manz, Beatrice F., “The development and meaning of Čagatay identity”, in Gross, Jo-Ann (ed.), Muslims in Central Asia: Expressions of Identity and Change (Durham, 1992), pp. 37–39 Google Scholar; eadem, “Multi-ethnic empires and the formulation of identity”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 26, no. 1 (2003), pp. 85-87.

17 Broadbridge, Anne F., Kingship and Ideology in the Islamic and Mongol worlds (Cambridge, 2008), pp. 77–80 Google Scholar, 97-98.

18 Beatrice F. Manz, “Mongol history rewritten and relived”, in Denise Aigle (ed.), Figures mythiques des mondes musulmans (Aix en Provence, 2001 = Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée 89-90), pp. 138-140.

19 See, for instance, “Mongol history rewritten and relived”; “Tamerlane and the symbolism of sovereignty”, Iranian Studies 21, no. 1-2 (1988) pp. 105-122; “Tamerlane's career and its uses”, Journal of World History 13, no. 1 (2002), pp. 1-25.

20 Bernardini, Michele, Mémoire et propagande à l'époque timouride, Studia Iranica. Cahier 37 (Paris, 2008), pp. 53–57 Google Scholar.

21 Aubin, Jean, “Comment Tamerlan prenait les villes”, Studia Islamica 19 (1963), pp. 118–119 Google Scholar; Niẓām al-Dīn Shāmī, Histoire des conquêtes de Tamerlan intitulée Ẓafarnāma par Niẓām al-Dīn Šāmī, (ed.) Felix Tauer (Prague, 1937-56: I [text of Shāmī]; II [additions by Ḥāfiẓ-i Abrū]), I, p. 91; Sharaf al-Dīn ‛Alī Yazdī, Ẓafarnāma, ed. Muḥammad ‛Abbāsī, 2 vols (Tehran, 1336/1957), II, p. 263.

22 Manz, “Mongol History rewritten and relived”, p. 139.

23 The one region Temür did not succeed in holding was Azerbaijan, ruled by tribal powers.

24 Woods, John E., “Timur's genealogy”, in Mazzaoui, Michael and Moreen, Vera B. (eds), Intellectual Studies on Islam: Essays Written in Honor of Martin B. Dickson (Salt Lake City, 1990), p. 116 Google Scholar and n. 129 at p. 124-125. Khalīl Sulṭān attempted to justify his usurpation of power by appointing as khan a son of Temür's first choice as successor, the deceased Muḥammad Sulṭān b. Jahāngīr, by a Chinggisid princess: Beatrice F. Manz, Power, Politics and Religion in Timurid Iran (Cambridge, 2007), p. 20.

25 Manz, “Tamerlane and the symbolism of sovereignty”, pp. 110-111.

26 Binbaş, Ilker Evrim, “The histories of Sharaf al-Dīn ‛Alī Yazdī: A formal Analysis”, Acta Orientalia 16, no. 4 (2012), p. 414 Google Scholar; Wood, John E., “The rise of Tīmūrīd historiography”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 46, no. 2 (1987), pp. 104–105 Google Scholar.

27 Woods, “Timur's genealogy”, pp. 87-88.

28 DeWeese, Devin A., Islamization and Native Religion in the Golden Horde: Baba Tükles and Conversion to Islam in Historical and Epic Tradition (University Park, PA, 1994), pp. 85–86 Google Scholar; Woods, John E., The Aqquyunlu: Clan, Confederation, Empire, revised and expanded edition. (Salt Lake City, 1999), pp. 7–9 Google Scholar.

29 Manz, Beatrice F., The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane (Cambridge, 1989), p. 147 Google Scholar.

30 See Subtelny, Maria, Timurids in Transition: Turko-Persian Politics and Acculturation in Medieval Iran, Brill's Inner Asian library 19 (Leiden, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Robinson, Francis, “Education”, in Irwin, Robert (ed.), New Cambridge History of Islam, IV (Cambridge, 2010), p. 514 Google Scholar.

32 Fleischer, Cornell H., Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire: The Historian Mustafa Âli (1541-1600) (Princeton, NJ, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, pp. 280-285.

33 Manz, “Tamerlane's career”, pp. 12-14; Maria Szuppe, “L'évolution de l'image de Timour et des Timourides dans l'historiographie safavide, XVIe-XVIIIe siècles”, in Szuppe (ed.), L'Héritage timouride Iran - Asie centrale - Inde XVe-XVIIIe siècles (Tashkent and Aix-en-Provence, 1997 = Cahiers d'Asie centrale), pp. 315-322; Quinn, Sholeh A, Historical Writing during the reign of Shah ‛Abbas: Ideology, Imitation, and Legitimacy in Safavid Chronicles (Salt Lake City, 2000), pp. 45 Google Scholar, 85; Tucker, Ernest, Nadir Shah's Quest for Legitimacy in post-Safavid Iran (Gainesville, FL, 2006), pp. 9–10 Google Scholar, 13, 37-38, 68-75.

34 Sela, Ron, The Legendary Biographies of Tamerlane: Islam and Heroic Apocrypha in Central Asia (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 16–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Ibid ., pp. 19-21, 28, 54-55.