No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 519 note 1 Ballantyne, , Mahābhāṣya, p. 34.Google Scholar
page 520 note 1 Indian Antiquary, 1915, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
page 521 note 1 Probably the same as is described in the Catalogue of the Sārnāth Museum, p. 318Google Scholar (No. G24(c)). For Indra's thunderbolt in Buddhist art see Grünwedel, & Burgess, , Buddhist Art in India, pp. 38, 87.Google Scholar
page 521 note 2 Bṁhatsaṃhitā, ch. ii, vv. 47–8.Google Scholar
page 521 note 3 Dānakhaṇḍa, ch. ii, pp. 757 f.Google Scholar The ratha is mentioned, but not the horses.
page 522 note 1 Sastri, H. Krishna, South Indian Images of Gods and Goddesses, fig. 147.Google Scholar
page 522 note 2 Smith, V. A., History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon, p. 162 and fig. xxxv.Google Scholar
page 522 note 3 One of the works of the Sangam is assigned by Mr. Smith to as early a date as 100 a.c (Early History, 3rd ed., p. 453).Google Scholar
page 523 note 1 Smith, V. A., History of Fine Art, figs. 191, 192.Google Scholar
page 523 note 2 As always on Gupta coins. See also Cunningham's Bhārhut, plates xxi–iii (Śiri holding lotus in hand).
page 523 note 3 Ibid., p. 113; Catalogue of the Sārnāth Museum, pp. 318–20.Google Scholar
page 523 note 4 Smith, V. A., History of Fine Art, pp. 138, 163.Google Scholar
page 523 note 5 Catalogue of Coins in the Indian Museum, Calcutta, vol. iGoogle Scholar, see No. 1 of Kadphises II; Nos. 9, 10, 67, and 71 of Kanishka; Nos. 15, 16, 40, and 43 of Huvishka; and No. 1 of Vāsudeva.
page 524 note 1 The reference is to Mēghadūta (gōpavēṣasya Viṣṇōḥ).
page 524 note 2 Pāṇḍuraṅgaṣṭakam of Śaṅkarācārya.
page 524 note 3 Sastri, H. Krishna, South Indian Images, pp. 84, 148.Google Scholar
page 524 note 4 Catalogue of the Sārnāth Museum, pl. xviii, p. 165.Google Scholar Hēmādri describes Rudra with five faces and ten hands.
page 524 note 5 Sastri, H. Krishna, op. cit., pp. 77, 148.Google Scholar
page 525 note 1 The number of hands in a Sātvik image should never be more than four, and in a Tāmasik image never less than eight. Rājasik images have sir or eight arms (Śilpa-saṅgraha). The distinction is illustrated by the images of Naṭarāja in Sastri, H. K.'s book (op. cit.), pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
page 526 note 1 Rāmāyaṇa i, 15. 16.Google Scholar
page 526 note 2 Whether in the Veda, as in the case of Rudra and Agni; or in the Purāṇas, as in the case of Gaṇēśa and other gods; or in the Āgamas, Vaiṣṇava, Śaiva, and Śākta