Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:49:31.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Birth of Pururavas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 412 note 1 See his conclusion, ZDMG. lxvi, 279Google Scholar, n. 1, which seems to me excellent sense, but fatal to his own case.

page 412 note 2 See Hopkins, , Greek Epic of India, pp. 59, 80.Google Scholar

page 412 note 3 VOJ. xxv, 153–86.Google Scholar

page 412 note 4 Kūrma, xx, 4Google Scholar seqq.; Liṅga, i, 65. 19 seqq.Google Scholar; Matsya, xi, 40Google Scholar seqq.; Padma, v, 8. 75 seqq.Google Scholar; Viṣṇu, iv, 1Google Scholar. δ seqq.; Brahma, vii, 3 seqq.Google Scholar; Harivaṃśa, i, 10. 3 seqq.Google Scholar; Vāyu, lxxxv, 3 seqq.Google Scholar; Mārkaṇḍeya, cxi, 6 seqq.Google Scholar; Bhāgavata, ix, 1. 3 seqq.Google Scholar Cf. Rāmāyaṇa, vii, 87 seqq.Google Scholar

page 412 note 5 Taittirīya Samhitā, i, 7. 1. 3Google Scholar; ii, 6. 7. 1–4; Brāhmaṇa, i, 1. 4, 47Google Scholar; Kāṭhaka, xi, 2Google Scholar; Satapatha Brāhmaṇa, i, 8. 1.Google Scholar

page 413 note 1 See Caland, , VOJ. xvii, 351Google Scholar; Winternitz, ibid. 292.

page 413 note 3 ZDMG. viii, 455Google Scholar seqq., and in his edition of the Pañcatantra (i, § 9).

page 413 note 3 Golther, , Handbuch der germanischen Mythologie, pp. 416 seqq.Google Scholar

page 413 note 4 The evidence is, in itself, quite insufficient, consisting only of a few Brāhmaṇa phrases (Maitrāyaṇī Saṃhitā, i, 6. 3Google Scholar; Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa, viii, 4. 2. 1Google Scholar), where metaphoric terms are used of Prajāpati's creative action.

page 413 note 5 Here, again, Hertel's view is not in accord with the best authorities on Greek religion.

page 414 note 1 Böhtlingk is blamed for not noting this form, but he could not do so as the Kāṭhaka was not printed until 1900.

page 415 note 1 Indische Studien, xiii, 22Google Scholar, n. 5, 47, n. 2. See also Wackernagel, , Altind. Gram, ii, 1. 134, 135Google Scholar; Macdonell, , Vedic Grammar, pp. 75, 76.Google Scholar

page 415 note 2 Op. cit. 49.

page 415 note 3 VOJ. xxv, 183.Google Scholar

page 416 note 1 See Macdonell, , Vedic Mythology, p. 139.Google Scholar

page 416 note 2 It is normally assumed to have this sense, so by Eggeling, Macdonell (Vedic Mythology, p. 124Google Scholar), Geldner, etc.

page 417 note 1 Cf. Āyu's parallelism with Apāṃ Napāt, emphasized by Geldner, , Vedische Studien, i, 275Google Scholar. Compare also Agni's close relationship with Purūravas (Ṛgveda, i, 31. 4Google Scholar), and with Āyu (śaṃsam Āyoḥ, iv, 6. 11Google Scholar; cf. ii, 4. 2). Moreover, in Kāṭhaka, viii, 10Google Scholar, Āyu and the fire are closely connected (cf. Weber, , Indische Studien, iii, 463Google Scholar; Geldner, , op. cit. i, 248).Google Scholar

page 417 note 2 Geldner, (op. cit. i, 283)Google Scholar admits this, and neither Bloomfield (JAOS. xx, 183Google Scholar) nor Oldenburg (Ṛgveda-Noten, i, 338Google Scholar) solves the difficulty.

page 417 note 3 See Rgveda, v, 62. 5, 6Google Scholar; vii, 64. 2.

page 417 note 4 That the other Samhitās borrowed from the Śatapatha is most improbable; they would doubtless have taken the metaphor of daughter if they had. The Satapatha is no doubt the later text.