No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
When the paper was read at a meeting of the Royal Asiatic Society, some exceptions were taken to it by Lord Stanley of Alderley. A report of these has been added to the report of the paper in the pages of the Society's Journal, and may possibly give occasion for doubt on a subject which I think of much importance to Mohammedans in British India and even of some to the Government itself. I therefore propose to answer the exceptions in detail and at some length. But it seems necessary, for the better understanding of them, that I should first state briefly the principles on which the argument of the paper was founded.
page 580 note 1 This term is expressly applied to Christians in works on Mohammedan Law, as for instance in the Futawa Alumgeeree, vol. ii. p. 273–4.
page 582 note 1 Kifayah, , vol. i. p. 397.Google Scholar
page 582 note 2 Ibid. p. 398.
page 582 note 3 Hidayah, , vol. i. p. 402Google Scholar; Futawa Alumgeeree, vol. i. pp. 202, 207.Google Scholar