No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
It is well known that every letter in the Persian alphabet has a numerical value. These values are perfectly conventional. They are as follows:—
1 I see Mr. Stanley Lane Poole, in his “Aurangzeb,” p. 167, gives this tārīkh as which yields but 1091 h. or 1680 a.d. He is right. The tārīkh given in the text is that of the death of Sambhājī, son of Sīvājī. Beale has misprinted Sīvājī for Sambhājī on p. 282.