Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:22:57.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Age of the Purāṇas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1021 note 1 JRAS. 1914, p. 745.Google Scholar

page 1021 note 2 Smith, Vincent, Early History of India, p. 23.Google Scholar

page 1022 note 1 Vedic Index, i, 76, 77, 540.Google Scholar See also below as to the important evidence of Āpastamba, not used by Messrs. Pargiter and Vincent Smith.

page 1022 note 2 IA. XXV, 323.

page 1022 note 3 Bombay Gazetteer, I, ii, 162.Google Scholar

page 1024 note 1 Early History of India, pp. 22, 23.Google Scholar

page 1024 note 2 Bühler, , SBE, ii, pp. xxix seq.Google Scholar

page 1024 note 3 p. xiii, n. 1; p. 42, n. 8.

page 1025 note 1 This passage differs from p. 4, 1. 6, and p. 10. 1. 5, in giving the length of the reign, and so is prophetic.

page 1025 note 2 JRAS. 1912, p. 1047.Google Scholar

page 1025 note 3 So Mr. Pargiter's view of 163 years for the Śiśunāgas in place of 360 is not accepted by Smith, Vincent, Early History 3, p. 45.Google Scholar

page 1025 note 4 The Kushan line survived until the fifth century in Kabul and the Saka Satraps until A.D. 388; see Smith, Vincent, op. cit. pp. 274, 292.Google Scholar

page 1026 note 1 Smith, Vincent, op. cit. pp. 310, 410.Google Scholar

page 1026 note 2 Ind. Forsch, xxxi, 198203.Google Scholar

page 1026 note 3 Op. cit. p. 304.

page 1026 note 4 Mazumdar, , JRAS. 1909, pp. 731 seqq.Google Scholar

page 1026 note 5 Hopkins, , Great Epic of India, p. 475.Google Scholar

page 1026 note 6 Smith, Vincent, op. cit. pp. 328–34Google Scholar; Fleet, , JRAS. 1914, pp. 398401.Google Scholar

page 1026 note 7 Takakusu, , JRAS. 1905, pp. 44 seqq.Google Scholar; Vidyābhūṣaṇa, Mediaeva School of Indian Logic, pp. 75–6.Google Scholar

page 1027 note 1 p. xvii, n. 2.

page 1027 note 2 See Bühler, , SBE. ii, pp. xxix seqq.Google Scholar

page 1028 note 1 See JRAS. 1914, p. 730.Google Scholar

page 1029 note 1 See e.g. Bühler, , SBE. ii, pp. xliv, xlvGoogle Scholar; Wackernagel, , Altind. Gramm. i, pp. xviii seqq.Google Scholar; Peterson, , JAOS. xxxii, 414–28Google Scholar; Keith, , Aitareya Āraṇyaka, pp. 180, 196Google Scholar; Hopkins, , Great Epic, pp. 261 seqq.Google Scholar

page 1030 note 1 Nirukta, i, 4Google Scholar; Bṛhaddevatā, ii, 90, 91.Google Scholar

page 1030 note 2 See Bühler, , SBE. ii, p. xxxGoogle Scholar; Pargiter, , Dynasties, p. xvii, n. 2.Google Scholar

page 1031 note 1 I take this opportunity to correct Mr. Pargiter's complete misunderstanding (JRAS. 1914, p. 743)Google Scholar of my statement that the Vedic texts are not books of historic purpose; that phrase merely means, as I think must be plain, that they do not deal with history; their historic context is incidental and in my view of infinitely greater value than the pseudo-history of the epic and Purāṇa texts.