Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T05:01:00.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Zoroastrian Period of Indian History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

A. Berriedale Keith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1916 , pp. 138 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 138 note 1 JRAS. 1915, pp. 63–89, 405–55.Google Scholar

page 138 note 2 Especially as he rejects Weber's views on Maya.

page 140 note 1 It is clear that Iran was not at once or early won to Zoroastrianism, even if we believe, as I do, that the Magians were Zoroastrian (JRAS. 1915, pp. 790–9).Google Scholar

page 142 note 1 It is clear that the equation of the Mauryan palace and the palace of Darius rests on wholly insufficient evidence on the archæological side. There is no a priori reason to deny its possibility, but it must be established by archæology, not by such evidence as adduced by Dr. Spooner.