Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:48:41.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Two Ends and the Middle Way A Suggested Reconstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

Of the five opportunities given me these thirty-nine years for such a talk on such an occasion as this, the present one may well be the last. I have on these occasions considered, in the Buddhist field, Women, the Will, Natural Causation, and the Man as Real. I would now say a few words on that which is, historically speaking, the most central subject of all—the subject which is, by general assent, within and without that religion, the New Word with which it was introduced, the first Mantra recorded as of the Founder of it, the so-called Benares ‘sermon’. For we may talk much about legends of him on the one hand, or about the many ways in which his teaching expanded at later periods, in so-called philosophy and in this and that word-value, obscuring the man-value, but the one thing of chief historical importance is and remains the Mantras he first uttered as teacher, and their significance in the religious history of the there and then. To this I would add, in the pertinent phrase of a recent synoptical narrative, “the meaning which these will have had in the mind of their original author.”

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 114 note 1 Gallaud, Marie, La Vie du Bouddha, 1931Google Scholar.

page 115 note 1 Davids, Rhys, Buddhist India (1903)Google Scholar.

page 115 note 2 Hermann Oldenberg, Buddha.

page 116 note 1 Saṃyutta-Nikāya, i, 75.

page 116 note 2 Bṛhad. Up., 4, 4, 8.

page 117 note 1 Saṃyutta, ii, 75 f., etc.

page 117 note 2 Ibid., 76, etc.

page 118 note 1 Vol. i (Tika-Nipāta), p 133; cf. Vinaya, i, 5; Saṃyutta, i, 137.

page 119 note 1 In Pali, koṭi, agga.

page 120 note 1 Cf. especially Senart, E., JRAS., 1898Google Scholar, on R. Chalmers' “Tathāgata”.

page 120 note 2 Cf. Ang. i, 217; Saṃy. iv, 253.

page 121 note 1 The one exception I find is in Kauṣ. Up., 3, 1.

page 123 note 1 Sakya, ch. xxiii.

page 123 note 2 E.g. Śvet. Up.