Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:42:56.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tetraeuangelium Sanctum juxta simplicem Syrorum Versionem ad fidem codicum, Massorae, editionum denuo recognitum, lectionum supellectilem, etc. By Philip Edward PuseyM.A., and George Henry GwilliamB.D. (Oxford, 1901.)

Review products

Tetraeuangelium Sanctum juxta simplicem Syrorum Versionem ad fidem codicum, Massorae, editionum denuo recognitum, lectionum supellectilem, etc. By Philip Edward PuseyM.A., and George Henry GwilliamB.D. (Oxford, 1901.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

S. A. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , July 1902 , pp. 676 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 677 note 1 The earliest dated MSS. belong to the middle of the sixth century.

page 678 note 1 Professor Rendel Harris, from an examination of two fifth-century MSS. not included in Mr. Gwilliam's list, comes to the same conclusion as regards the fixed state of the text; see bis article in the London Quarterly Review, January, 1902.

page 679 note 1 The date of the establishment of the Peshitta text has recently been ascribed with great probability to the time of Rabbūlā, Bishop of Edessa (411–435 a.d.). Mr. F. C. fiurkitt, to whom this is due, has proved conclusively that the terminus a quo must be subsequent to the Syrian father Ephrem (died 373). The terminus ad quem is probably barely a century later. (See Burkitt, , “St. Ephraim's Quotations from the Gospels,” Text and Studies, 1901, vii, 2Google Scholar.)