No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
This inscription of great historical importance was discovered by the copyists of J. F. Fleet in 1884 and was first published by him in the Indian Antiquary, XV, in 1886. He subsequently included it in the Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, Vol. III, which he edited and which was published in 1888. Sir R. G. Bhandarkar published some corrections to the text and translation in JBBRAS, XVII (1887–89). F. Kielhorn published the correction of a reading in verse 31 which much improved the sense. The late A. L. Basham presented a fresh study of this epigraph, in his paper read at the symposium on the Gupta Period of Indian history at Carlton College in Northfield, Minnesota, in 1977. The papers presented at this symposium have now been printed under the title Essays on Gupta culture
1 Published by Moti Lai Banarsi Das, Delhi, 1983.Google Scholar
2 Essays on Gupta Culture, p. 99.Google Scholar
3 CII, III, p. 82.Google Scholar We had pointed out the correction of priyam into šriyam, in our “Epigraphic notes” published in the Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, IV Session, Lahore (1940).Google Scholar
4 CII, III, pp. 83, 86–87Google Scholar.
5 JBBRAS, XVII (1887–1889), pp. 80 ffGoogle Scholar.
6 Op. cit., p. 102.Google Scholar
7 Göttinger Nachr., 1890, pp 251–253.Google Scholar
8 CII, III, p. 83,Google Scholar line 19.
9 Ibid., p. 87.
10 Op. cit., p. 103.Google Scholar
11 Cf. Sircar, D. C., Select Inscriptions, I, p. 295.Google Scholar
12 Op. cit., pp. 103–04.Google Scholar
13 CII, III, p. 153,Google Scholar line 9; ibid., p. 156.
14 Mirashi, V. V., Studies in Ancient Indian History, Bombay, 1984, pp. 27 ff.Google Scholar
15 Risthal Inscription, verses pp. 16 and 18.Google ScholarMirashi, , op. cit.,Google Scholar
16 CII, III, pp. 82 and 85 respectivelyGoogle Scholar.
17 Op. cit., p. 97.Google Scholar
18 JBBRAS, XVII (1887–1889), pp. 80 ff.Google Scholar
19 Ibid.