Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:18:33.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Masterpieces of Oriental Art. 16: Late Mauryan or Early Śuṅga Ring-stones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

A carved ring-stone and fragment of a second similar stone, both probably of the late Mauryan or early Śuṅga period, are among minor antiquities of exceptional interest recently acquired by the Indian Section, Victoria and Albert Museum, from the collection of Colonel D. H. Gordon, D.S.O., O.B.E. Both pieces were bought some years ago by Colonel Gordon from a local dealer in the Taxila area. Their special interest derives not only from fineness of craftsmanship but also from the fact that their use has remained an archæological problem for more than seventy years. A full description follows:—

A. Ring-stone: greyish-buff sandstone, highly polished. Carved in low relief, the upper surface having two concentric cableedged bands filled with cross-and-reel motives (slightly pyramidal); the sides of the hole with four standing female nudes alternating with four flowering trees. The base and outer sides are left plain.

Outer diameter, 3·37 inches. Inner diameter, 1·06 inches. Depth, 1 inch. Weight, 8¾ ounces.

B. Fragment of ring-stone: pinkish-buff sandstone, highly polished. Carved in slightly deeper relief, the upper surface decoration being identical with A. A similar standing female nude appears on the side of the hole, but beside her, instead of a flowering tree, there is an Indian “honeysuckle” motive, partly visible. The base and outer side are left plain.

The following measurements are based on a reconstruction of the complete ring. Outer diameter, 3·37 inches. Inner diameter, 0·84 inches. Depth, 0·75 inches.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 I.S. 82–1948.

page 1 note 2 The references to all the ring-stones so far published are as follows: Cunningham, A., A.S.R., vol. xi, 1880., pl. ix, 3Google Scholar; Annual Report, A.S.I., 1920–21, pl. xvii, 29 and 30; ibid, 1927–28, pl. xx, 7; ibid, 1930–34, pl. cxxx, 1 and 2; Journal of Indian Society of Oriental Art, vol. iii, 1935, pl. xxx, 3Google Scholar.

page 2 note 1 Annual Report, A.S.I., 1906–7, p. 122, fig. 4.

page 2 note 2 Annual Report, A.S.I., 1935–36, pl. xxiii (a).

page 2 note 3 p. 20.

page 2 note 4 Mohenjo-daro and the Indus Civilization, vol. i, 1931, pp. 62–3Google Scholar.

page 2 note 5 Annual Report, A.S.I., 1920–21, p. 21.