No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2009
1 “Le Livre de Jean d'lbelin”, ed. Beugnot, Comte A., Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, Lois, vol. I, (Paris, 1841), pp. 1–432.Google Scholar
2 Rudt de Collenberg, W. H., “Les premiers Ibelins”, Le Moyen Age, LXXI (1965), pp. 433–74;Google Scholar “Les Ibelins aux XNIe et XlVe siècles. Généalogie compilée principalement selon les registres du Vatican”, Epeteris tou Kentrou Epistemonikon Ereunon, IX (1979), pp. 117–265,Google Scholar reproduced in his Families de 1'Orient Latin, Xlle–XIVe siècles (Variorum Reprints, London, 1983).Google Scholar Lamonte, J. L., “John of Ibelin, the old lord of Beirut, 1177–1236”, Byzantion, XII (1937), pp. 417–58.Google Scholar Edbury, P. W., “The Ibelin Counts of Jaffa: a previously unknown passage from the ‘Lignages d'Outremer’”, English Historical Review, LXXXIX (1974), pp. 604–10;CrossRefGoogle Scholar “John of Ibelin's title to the County of Jaffa and Ascalon”, ibid., XCVIII (1983), pp. 115–33. H.-E., Mayer, “Ibelin versus Ibelin: the struggle for the regency ofjerusalem, 1253–1258”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, CXXII (1978), pp. 25–57;Google Scholar “John of Jaffa. His opponents and his fiefs”, ibid., CXXVIII (1984), pp. 134–63; “Carving up Crusaders: the early Ibelins and Ramlas”, in Kedar, B. Z., Mayer, H.-E. and Smail, R. C., eds., Outremer: Studies in the History of the Crusading Kingdom of jerusalem (Jerusalem, 1982), pp. 101–18;Google Scholar “The double county of Jaffa and Ascalon: one fief or two?”, in Edbury, P. W., ed., Crusade and Settlement (Cardiff, 1985), pp. 181–90.Google Scholar
3 Grandclaude, M., “Classement sommaire des manuscrits des principaux livres des assises de Jérusalem”, Revue historique de droit français et étranger, sér. 4, vol. v (1926), pp. 418–75.Google Scholar
4 Richard, J., “Pairie d'Orient latin: les quatre baronnies des royaumes de Jérusalem et de Chypre”, Revue historique de droit français et étranger, sér. 4, vol. xxviii (1950), pp. 67–88.Google Scholar