Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:03:02.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduzione allo Studio della Filosofia Indiana. By Luigi Suali. Pavia, 1913.

Review products

Introduzione allo Studio della Filosofia Indiana. By Luigi Suali. Pavia, 1913.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1090 note 1 Gött. Nach. 1901, pp. 460–84.Google Scholar

page 1090 note 2 JAOS. xxxi, 1 seqq.Google Scholar

page 1091 note 1 Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient, iv, 53 seqq.Google Scholar

page 1091 note 2 Op. cit. xi, 355–61. See Franke, , JRAS. 1914, pp. 398401Google Scholar; Thomas, , pp. 748, 749.Google Scholar

page 1091 note 3 JRAS. 1914, pp. 603–7.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 1 Cf. Thomas, , JRAS. 1913, p. 1033.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 2 JAOS. xxxi, 2, n. 1.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 3 Published in JASB. 1898.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 4 See Bhattacharya, Vidhushekhara, JRAS. 1914, pp. 747–8.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 5 JAOS. xxxi, 3.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 6 See Thomas, , JRAS. 1913, p. 1032Google Scholar; Kavīndravacanasamuccaya, pp. 25–9.Google Scholar

page 1092 note 7 I accept for the purpose of this argument the date now generally accepted for the Arthaśāstra on insufficient evidence.

page 1092 note 8 JAOS. xxxi, 6, 29.Google Scholar

page 1093 note 1 Suali, , p. 27.Google Scholar

page 1093 note 2 Tarkasaṁgraha, Introd. p. 21Google Scholar. His theory of two recensions of Kaṇāda is improbable and may be disregarded.

page 1093 note 3 p. 416, n. 5, following Jacobi, , Ind. Log. p. 479.Google Scholar

page 1093 note 4 ix, 2. 1; cf. iii, 1. 9, where the last differs.

page 1093 note 5 See references in Kennedy, , JRAS. 1913, p. 371Google Scholar; Jolly, , Medizin, p. 10Google Scholar; cf. Keith, , ZDMG. lxii, 136.Google Scholar

page 1094 note 1 Ind. Log. pp. 482–4.Google Scholar

page 1095 note 1 Muséon, 1904, pp. 129–71.Google Scholar

page 1096 note 1 Suali, , pp. 423, 424.Google Scholar

page 1096 note 2 Suali, , pp. 364–76.Google Scholar

page 1097 note 1 Cf. Suali, , pp. 268–70Google Scholar, who gives a valuable discussion of buddhi, not “intelligence”, but “thoughts”.

page 1097 note 2 Cf. Vidyābhūṣaṇa's remark, op. cit. p. 96, n. 1.

page 1097 note 3 Suali, , pp. 126–35.Google Scholar

page 1097 note 4 Suali, , p. 178Google Scholar, n. 2, seems to waver in his view on this point.

page 1098 note 1 1908, pp. 522–6.

page 1098 note 2 Encyc. of Religion and Ethics, i, 202.Google Scholar

page 1098 note 3 Suali, , pp. 5762.Google Scholar

page 1099 note 1 Suali, , pp. 80–4Google Scholar. Cf. for the dates, Keith, , Bodleian Catalogue, Appendix, pp. 73–4Google Scholar. The date of Jagadīśa's pupil (Suali, , p. 94Google Scholar) given by Aufrecht is not quite correct; see Keith, , p. 74.Google Scholar