Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:43:23.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indica by L.D. Barnett - 8. Memoirs of the Archæological Survey of India. No. 30: The Beginnings of Art in Eastern India, with special reference to Sculptures in the Indian Museum, Calcutta. By Ramaprasad Chanda M.A., F.A.S.B., Rai Bahadur. No. 32: Fragment of a Prajnaparamita Manuscript from Central Asia. By Pandit B. B. Bidyabinod. 13 × 10 in., pp. 54, 7 plates, pp. 12 + i, 4 plates. Calcutta: Government of India Central Publication Branch, 1927.

Review products

8. Memoirs of the Archæological Survey of India. No. 30: The Beginnings of Art in Eastern India, with special reference to Sculptures in the Indian Museum, Calcutta. By Ramaprasad Chanda M.A., F.A.S.B., Rai Bahadur. No. 32: Fragment of a Prajnaparamita Manuscript from Central Asia. By Pandit B. B. Bidyabinod. 13 × 10 in., pp. 54, 7 plates, pp. 12 + i, 4 plates. Calcutta: Government of India Central Publication Branch, 1927.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

L. D. Barnett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , October 1928 , pp. 940 - 942
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Rai Bahadur thinks (pp. 21 ff., 33) that Aśōka refers to the construction of such divine figures when in his Minor Rock-inscriptions he says that “the gods who previously did not mingle [with men] in Jambūdvīpa have now been made to mingle”. This seems unlikely. Aśōka speaks of the mingling of gods with men as a result of his propagation of the Faith, whereas some, perhaps many, of these divine figures, as our author admits, were constructed before his reign; and moreover it is hardly usual to apply the term dēva to animals such as bulls and lions. Aśōka, I suspect, refers in this connexion to the common belief that various gods are incarnated in the person of a righteous king, and means that the rulers of India—himself and his governors—have now become “godly”, literally inspired by deities.