34. The general evolution of the PI consonants, together with the special question of dialectical differences arising therefrom, has been set forth by Dr. Bloch. It will be sufficient here to note the chief features in that development, with special reference to Gujarātī.
page 505 note 1 Id., § 14 ff.
page 509 note 1 Bloch, § 84.
page 509 note 2 Id., § 86.
page 511 note 1 LSI. ix, 2, p. 330.Google Scholar
page 511 note 2 Wackernagel, i, § 119.
page 511 note 3 Id., § 131 ff.
page 511 note 4 Id., § 141.
page 511 note 5 LSI. ix, 2, p. 330.Google Scholar
page 511 note 6 Wackernacel, i, § 145a.
page 511 note 7 Id., §§ 146–7.
page 514 note 1 Bloch, § 118.
page 514 note 2 Id., § 119.
page 515 note 1 LSI. ix, 2, p. 329.Google Scholar
page 515 note 2 Id., p. 331.
page 515 note 3 Id., p. 330.
page 515 note 4 Id., p. 330.
page 516 note 1 Cf. Bloch, § 132.
page 516 note 2 Turner, , JRAS. 1915, p. 21.Google Scholar
page 517 note 1 Bloeh, § 150.
page 517 note 2 Wackernagel, § 191 ff.
page 517 note 3 Id., § 129.
page 518 note 1 Tessitori, , Ind. Ant., xliii, p. 55.Google Scholar
page 518 note 2 LSI. ix, 2, p. 330.Google Scholar
page 520 note 1 Pischel, § 87.
page 526 note 1 Turner, , JRAS., 01, 1915, p. 21 ff.Google Scholar
page 528 note 1 Pischel, § 148.
page 532 note 1 Bloch, § 94.
page 532 note 2 Pischel, § 566.
page 539 note 1 Pischel, § 312.