No CrossRef data available.
1 The text in the Calcutta edition (p. 18, 1. 5) reads mālava-pati, which is clearly a mistake. The variants in the Bibl. Indica ed. are mānava-pati and ānada-pati, of which the latter seems to be the correct reading from the author's own comment on the word (pp. 19–20). See also i, 2.