Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
One of the striking differences between the phonetic systems of Indo-Aryan and its parent Indo-European is the existence in the former of the cerebral series of sounds as well as the dental. These appear among the stops, the nasals, the sibilants, and later among the liquids also. Thus opposed to Indo-European t th d dh, n, s z, l r we find in the various Indo-Aryan languages the two series—
t th d dh, n, s *z, l r
ṭ ṭh ḍ ḍh, ṇ, ṣ *ẓ, ḷ ṛ ṛh.
Of these, *z *ẓ belong to the prehistoric and ṛ ṛh to the modern period.
page 555 note 1 Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes, p. 12.
page 555 note 2 p. 49.
page 556 note 1 Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, vol. xix, pp. 254, 267, 277.Google Scholar
page 556 note 2 Meillet, Introduction, p. 73.
page 556 note 3 Cf. Wackernagel, , Altindische Grammatik, i, §§ 149, 150.Google Scholar
page 558 note 1 Wackernagel, i, pp. 169, 171.
page 558 note 2 i, pp. 167 ff.
page 558 note 3 La formation de la langue marathe, pp. 117 ff.
page 558 note 4 JRAS. 1921, p. 512.
page 558 note 5 Cf. Bloch, p. 126.
page 561 note 1 Wackernagel, i, §§ 146–7.
page 561 note 2 Bloch, p. 48.
page 562 note 1 Cf. Childers, Pāli Dictionary, sub voce.
page 564 note 1 Linguistic Survey of India, vol. viii, pt. i, p. 23.Google Scholar
page 565 note 1 Cf. also Bloch, , Journal Asiatique, 1912, i, p. 335.Google Scholar
page 565 note 2 Slavisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, p. 456.
page 565 note 3 i, p. 171.
page 565 note 4 Mikkola, Urslavische Grammatik, p. 59.
page 566 note 1 Ib., p. 72.
page 567 note 1 Cf. Wackernagel, i, § 133, note, and § 148; Bloch, p. 125.
page 567 note 2 p. 96.
page 573 note 1 p. 414.
page 573 note 2 Cf. Bloch, p. 137.
page 574 note 1 p. 136.
page 574 note 2 p. 293.
page 574 note 3 Cf. Macdonell, Vedic Grammar, p. 14.
page 574 note 4 Cf. Mcillet, Introduction, p. 95. Old Irish rīgain “queen” < *rēg,onī presents an exact parallel.
page 575 note 1 These are all taken from Grierson : The Piśāca Languages.
page 578 note 1 Bloch, p. 18.
page 578 note 2 Pischel, Grammatik der Prakrit-sprachen, p. 29.
page 578 note 3 Ib., p. 40.
page 579 note 1 Cf. LSI. viii, 1, p. 185.
page 579 note 2 Cf. lists of words given passim in LSI. viii, 1, Lahndā section.
page 579 note 3 LSI. ix, 2, pp. 382, 413, 437.
page 580 note 1 Cf. Grundriss dsr iranischen Philologie, i, 2, pp. 207–8.
page 580 note 2 Cf. Wackernagel, i, p. 192.
page 580 note 3 See p. 581, n. 1.
page 581 note 1 For lists see Wackernagel, i, pp. 193–4.
page 581 note 2 See the map in Grierson, The Piśāca Languages.
page 581 note 3 Grierson, Piśāca Languages, p. 64; Horn, Neupersische Etymologie, p. 183.
page 582 note 1 Cf. Bloch, p. 137.