Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:26:42.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Babor; Babbāpura

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

J. Ph. Vogel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1907 , pp. 403 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 403 note 1 The MS. has Kīrtinyabbapurādhīśaś, which is to be emended Kīrtir = Babbāpurādhīśaś. Cf. Stein's, note in his Rājat. transl., vol. i, p. 315.Google Scholar

page 404 note 1 Jāsaṭa was the son of Asaṭa, whose sister Bappikā was Harsa's mother. The names of both Āsaṭa and Jāsaṭa occur in contemporaneous inscriptions.

page 404 note 2 For the account of Sussala's expedition, cf. Rājat. viii, 621–635. I have quoted Dr. Stein's translation.Google Scholar

page 405 note 1 Drew, F.: “A Geographical Account of the Jammu and Kashmir Territories” (London, 1875), p. 87.Google Scholar

page 405 note 2 Bühler, G., “The two praśastis of Baijnāth”: Epigr. Ind., vol. i, pp. 97ff.Google Scholar I am to add that the true date of these inscriptions is Śaka 1126 (A.D. 1204), and not Śaka 726 (A.D. 804) as has been hitherto supposed. Cf. Kielhorn, F., Ind. Ant., vol. xx (1891), p. 154.Google Scholar

page 406 note 1 Archæological Survey Report, 1902–1903, p. 268.Google Scholar

page 406 note 2 “Ancient Geography of India,” p. 133.Google Scholar