No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
The solution about to be proposed is quite new. By such Chinese specialists as may see it, if any, I confidently expect it to be derided. By the few Western students who concern themselves with this branch of inquiry, it will perhaps seem rather improper, rather improbable, and “rather interesting, all the same”.
page 209 note 1 Chalmers, , The Structure of Chinese Characters, p. 46Google Scholar, and 18, and Wieger, , Chinese Characters (English version), “an empty vessel and its cover,” p. 103Google Scholar.
page 211 note 1 Fig. 1, Y.H.S.K., Hou Pien, ;, p. 12; (2) Y.H.S.K., Ch. 6, p. 37; (3) Yin Ch'i I Ts'un, Bone 98; (4) Ibid., Bone 537.
page 216 note 1 1. T'ieh-yün Tsang Kuei, p. 227. 2. Yin Hsü Shu Ch'i, Vol. 7, p. 28. 3. Ibid. Vol. 6, p. 39. 4. Yin Hsü Wên Tzuŭ in the I Shu Ts'ung Pien, No. 14, p. 22.
page 218 note 1 Legge, , Chinese Classics, vol. iv, part 2, p. 450Google Scholar, renders this: “The Kuan hordes fled away.”