Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:45:36.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Unusual Use of the Nominative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

A. Berriedale Keith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 1908 , pp. 1124 - 1127
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1124 note 2 Vergl. Synt., i, 397.Google ScholarSpeyer, , Vedische und Sanskrit Syntax, pp. 6, 7,Google Scholar ignores the usage. Cf., however, his Sanskrit Syntax, p. 196,Google Scholar n., and Böhtlingk, , Z.D.M.G., xli, 183, for bhavān with second person (a contamination).Google Scholar

page 1125 note 1 Of course, hāsīt from has is possible (cf. e.g. sākhaṣye, Atharvaveda, ii, 27, 5,Google Scholar with Whitney's note), but it is very unlikely. Conceivably, too, hāeīḥ might be regarded as a third person, just as Weber takes syāḥ in Atharvaveda, xviii, 1, 25,Google Scholar see Berl. Stiz., 1895, p. 830.Google Scholar

page 1125 note 2 Weber, , Ind. Stud., x, 134, conjectured hāsīḥGoogle Scholar

page 1126 note 1 Cf. Weber, , Ind. Stud., xviii, 11.Google Scholar

page 1126 note 2 Cf. also kṛta in Ṛgveda, vi, 58, 3,Google Scholar where the Saṁhita, Maitrāyaṇī, iv, 14, 16,Google Scholar and Brāhmaṇa, Taittirīya, ii, 5, 5, 5, have Kṛtáḥ.Google Scholar

page 1126 note 3 e.g. in Ṛgveda, i, 184, 3,Google Scholar if we accept Pischel's explanation (Ved. Stvd., i, 18).Google Scholar See also Atharvaveda, ii, 14, 5; vi, 1, 1; 67, 2; vii, 89, 3; xi, 6, 23; xviii, 4, 1. 6;Google Scholar perhaps xviii, 3, 63, with Whitney's notes.

page 1127 note 1 Haskell, , J.A.O.S., xi, 66.Google Scholar The construction has parallels in Greek: Monro, , Homeric Grammar2, p. 155;Google ScholarDelbrück, , Synt. Forsch., iv, 28.Google Scholar