Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T18:14:27.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Capital Budgeting Analysis of Electricity Generation on Egg Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Boris E. Bravo-Ureta  and
Glen McMahon
Boris E. Bravo-Ureta
Affiliation:
The Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Connecticut
Glen McMahon
Affiliation:
The Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Get access

Abstract

This paper analyzes the economic feasibility of an investment designed to digest anaerobically cage layer manure and convert biogas into electricity which is sold to a public utility. A simulation model is used to calculate the after-tax net present value (NPV) of a digestion system for eight egg farms differing in size under alternative scenarios. The results show that farm size and electricity price projections have a major impact on the magnitude and sign of the NPV estimates. Technical performance also has a marked effect on the investments’ feasibility, while tax credits and low interest rates have a relatively minor influence.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1983 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge the review comments of Marilyn Altobello, Stanley Seaver, and two anonymous reviewers.

Scientific Contribution No. 989, Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

References

Ashare, Ε., Wise, D. L., and Wentworth, R. L. Fuel Gas Production from Animal Residue. Dynatech Report No. 1551. ERDA Contract No. EY-76-C-02-2991, Washington, D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
Gaddy, J. L., Park, Ε. L., and Rapp, Ε. P. “Kinetics and Economics of Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Waste.” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: An International Journal, Vol. 3, 1974.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, A. G., and Chen, Y. R. “Economic Optimization of Anaerobic Fermenter Designs.” Paper presented at the Fourth International ASAE Symposium on Livestock Wastes, Amarillo, Texas, April 1980.Google Scholar
House, D. The Complete Biogas Handbook. Aurora, Oregon: At Home Everywhere, 1978.Google Scholar
Jewell, William J. et al. Bio Conversion of Agricultural Wastes for Pollution Control and Energy Conservation. Final report from Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. ERDA contract NSF 741222. Washington, D.C.: NTIS, 1975.Google Scholar
Latimer, Robert G., and Bezpa, John. Projections and Cash Flow: For a 30,000 and 60,000 Bird Commercial Table Egg Operation. Cooperative Extension Service Bull. 418. 2nd printing. Rutgers Univesity, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1977.Google Scholar
McMahon, Glen V. An Economic Analysis of Methane Generation from Cage Layer Manure. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Connecticut, 1982.Google Scholar
Melichar, E. “Capital Gains Versus Current Income in the Farm Sector.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ. 61, December 1979.Google Scholar
Morris, G. R., Jewell, W. J., and Loehr, R. C. “Anaerobic Fermentation of Animal Wastes: Design and Operational Criteria,” in Food, Fertilizer, and Agricultural Residues, edited by Loehr, R. C., Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1975.Google Scholar
Morrison, S. R. et al. “Biogas from Poultry Manure: Volatile Solids Loading Rate and Hydraulic Detention Time.” Paper presented at the Fourth International ASAE Symposium on Livestock Wastes, Amarillo, Texas, April 1980.Google Scholar
Persson, Sverker P. et al. Agricultural Anaerobic Digesters: Design and Operation. Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 827. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 1979.Google Scholar
Reagan, R. Program for Economic Recovery. Message from the President of the United States, 97th Congress, Session 1, House Document No. 97–21, February 1981.Google Scholar
Rogers, George B. “Poultry and Eggs” in Another Revolution in U.S. Farming? L. P. Schertz and Others, USDA, 1979.Google Scholar
Schiefen, L. M. “Parallel Generation of Electricity with the Electric Utility.” Paper presented at the NRAES Methane Technology for Agriculture Conference, Ithaca, New York, March 1981.Google Scholar
Skinner, Stephen. Production Response and Structural Change in the Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire Egg Industry Resulting from Adjustment in the Level of Freight Rates. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1980.Google Scholar
Siane, Thomas Ε. An Economic Analysis of Methane Generation on Commercial Poultry Farms. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, 1974.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the U.S. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. Farmers Tax Guide. Publication 225, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1980.Google Scholar