Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:33:39.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Vertical Distribution and Diurnal Migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda Collected During the SOND Cruise, 1965 I. The Gammaridea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Michae L H. Thurston
Michae L H. Thurston
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Surrey, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Detailed studies of the vertical distribution and migration of the micronekton, plankton and sonic scattering layers in an oceanic environment off Fuertaventura in the Canary Islands were made from R.R.S. ‘Discovery’ during September to December 1965. A general account, including a statement of the objectives of the cruise, has been given by Currie, Boden & Kampa (1969). Foxton (1969) has described the biological sampling methods and techniques utilized. Results of sonic scattering investigations have been published by Blaxter & Currie (1967) and Boden & Kampa (1967). The present study deals only with the pelagic amphipods, and forms a contribution to a series (Angel, 1969; Clarke, 1969b; Baker, 1970; Foxton, 1970a, b; Badcock, 1970; Roe, 1972a, b, c, d; Pugh, 1974) dealing with the distribution and migration of the major taxa sampled during the investigation. An objective summary of the plankton data utilizing factor analysis and cluster analysis has been provided by Angel & Fasham (1973, 1974).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 1976 , pp. 359 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angel, M. V., 1969. Planktonic ostracods from the Canary Island region; their depth distributions, diurnal migrations, and community organization. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 515–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, M. V. & Fasham, M. J. R., 1973. SOND Cruise, 1965: factor and cluster analyses of the plankton results, a general summary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 53, 185–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, M. V. & Fasham, M. J. R., 1974. SOND Cruise, 1965: further factor analyses of the plankton data. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 879–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badcock, J., 1970. The vertical distribution of mesopelagic fishes collected on the SOND Cruise. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1001–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. De C., 1970. The vertical distribution of euphausiids near Fuertaventura, Canary Islands (‘Discovery’ SOND Cruise, 1965). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 301–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. De C., Clarke, M. R. & Harris, M. J., 1973. The N.I.O. combination net (RMT 1 + 8) and further developments of rectangular midwater trawls. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 53, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. Natural History Report. British Antarctic Terra Nova Expedition, 1910, Zoology, 8 (4), 307–454.Google Scholar
Barnard, K. H., 1932. Amphipoda. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 5, 1–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behning, A., 1925. Amphipoda der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. 1. Hyperiidea Fam. Vibiliidae Claus 1872. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, 19 (9), 479–500.Google Scholar
Behning, A., 1927. Die Vibiliiden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 113–121.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1955. Pelagic gammarids (Amphipoda-Gammaridea) of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 12, 210–287.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1958. Pelagic gammarids (Amphipoda- Gammaridea) of the north-western part of the Pacific Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 27, 219–257.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1960. Pelagic gammarids of the tropical Pacific Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 34, 165–241.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1962. Pelagic gammarids (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) collected by the Soviet Antarctic Expedition on d/e “Ob” south of 40° S. (In Russian.) Issledovaniya Fauny Morei, I (IX), Resultaty biologicheskikh issledovanii Sovetskoi antarkticheskoi ekspeditsii (1955–1958), 1, 36–57. (English translation: Biological Reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition) (1955–1958), 1, 33–56. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1966.)Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1963. Deep-sea pelagic amphipods of the Philippine Trench. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 71, 81–94.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1964. Pelagic gammarids of the northern part of the Indian Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 65, 152–195.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. & Vinogradov, M. E., 1970. On the fauna of pelagic gammarids in the Kurile-Kamchatka region of the Pacific Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 86, 401–419. (English translation: Fauna of Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and its environment, 419–438. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1972.)Google Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. & Currie, R. I., 1967. The effect of artificial lights on acoustic scattering layers in the ocean. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 19, 1–14.Google Scholar
Boden, B. P. & Kampa, E. M., 1967. The influence of natural light on the vertical migrations of an animal community in the sea. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 19, 15–26.Google Scholar
Bogorov, B. G., 1958. Biogeographical regions of the plankton of the north-western Pacific Ocean and their influence on the deep sea. Deep-Sea Research, 5, 149–161.Google Scholar
Bowman, T. E. & Mccain, J. C, 1967. Variation and distribution of the pelagic amphipod Cyphocaris challengeri in the northeast Pacific (Gammaridea; Lysianassidae). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 122 (3588), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregazzi, P. K., 1972. Life cycles and seasonal movements of Cheirimedon femoratus (Pfeffer) and Tryphosella kergueleni (Miers) (Crustacea: Amphipoda). British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 30, 1–34.Google Scholar
Brusca, G. J., 1967. The ecology of pelagic Amphipoda, 1. Species accounts, vertical zonation and migration of Amphipoda from the waters off Southern California. Pacific Science, 21, 382–393.Google Scholar
Brusca, G. J., 1973. Pelagic Amphipoda from the waters near Oahu, Hawaii, excluding the family Scinidae. Pacific Science, 27, 8–27.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1900. Amphipodes provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle (1885–1888). Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accompliés sur son yacht par Albert Ier Prince Souverain de Monaco, 16, 1–195.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1935. Amphipodes provenant des campagnes scientifiques du Prince Albert Ier de Monaco. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accompliés sur son yacht par Albert Ier Prince Souverain de Monaco, 90, 1–230.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. R., 1969 a. A new midwater trawl for sampling discrete depth horizons. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. R., 1969 b. Cephalopoda collected on the SOND Cruise. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 961–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutter, R. I. & Anraku, M., 1968. Avoidance of samplers. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, 2, 57–76.Google Scholar
Currie, R. I., Boden, B. P. & Kampa, E. M., 1969. An investigation on sonic-scattering layers: the R.R.S. ‘Discovery’ SOND Cruise, 1965. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damas, D. & Koefoed, E., 1907. Le plankton de la Mer du Grönland. In Due d'Orleans Croisière Océanographique dans la Mer du Grönland en 1905, Résultats Scientifiques, 347–453.Google Scholar
David, P. M., 1965. The neuston net. A device for sampling the surface fauna of the ocean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 45, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, F., 1961. The planktonic Crustacea of the Petula transatlantic expedition. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 172, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fage, L., 1960. Oxycephalidae, amphipodes pelagique. Dana Reports, No. 52, 1–145.Google Scholar
Foxton, P., 1963. An automatic opening-closing device for large plankton nets and midwater trawls. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxton, P., 1969. SOND Cruise 1965. Biological sampling methods and procedures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxton, P., 1970 a. The vertical distribution of pelagic decapods (Crustacea: Natantia) collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. I. The Caridea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 939–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxton, P., 1970 b. The vertical distribution of pelagic decapods (Crustacea: Natantia) collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. The Penaeidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 961–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franqueville, C., 1971. Macroplancton profond (invertébrés) de la Mediterranée nord-occidental. Téthys, 3, 11–56.Google Scholar
De Gerlache, A., Helland-Hansen, B., Koefoed, E. & Broch, H., 1907. Journal des stations. In Due d'Orleans Croisière Océanographique dans la Mer du Grönland en 1905, Résultats Scientifiques, 125–272.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Gunther, E. R., 1935. The plankton of the South Georgia whaling grounds and adjacent waters. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 9, 1–456.Google Scholar
Hure, J., 1955. Distribution annuelle verticale du zooplancton sur une station de l'Adriatique meridionale. Acta adriatica, 7 (7), 1–72.Google Scholar
Hure, J., 1961. Drievna migracija i sezonska vertikalna raspodjela zooplanktona dubljeg mora. (With French summary.) Acta adriatica, 9 (6), 1–59.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1968. Développement en élevage et systématique d'Hyperia schizogeneios Stebb. (Amphipoda, Hypéride). Archives de zoologie expérimental et générale, 109, 25–67.Google Scholar
Laval, P., 1974. Un modèle mathématique de l'évitement d'un filet à plancton, son application pratique, et sa vérification indirecte en recourant au parasitisme de l'amphipode hypéride Vibilia armata Bovallius. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 14, 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. B. & Fish, A. G., 1969. Seasonal variation of the zooplankton fauna of surface waters entering the Caribbean Sea at Barbados. Caribbean Journal of Science, 9 (1–2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Mogk, H., 1927. Die Phronimiden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 123–144.Google Scholar
Moraitu-Apostolopoulou, M., 1971. Vertical distribution, diurnal and seasonal migrations of copepods in Saronic Bay, Greece. Marine Biology, 9, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østvedt, O. -J., 1955. Zooplankton investigations from Weather Ship M in the Norwegian Sea, 1948–49. Hvalrådets skrifter, No. 40, 1–93.Google Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1929 a. Résultats zoologiques de la croisiére Atlantique de l’“Armauer Hansen”. I. Les amphipodes hypérides. Memoires de la Societé royale des sciences de Liège, Ser. 3, 15 (1), 1–196.Google Scholar
Pirlot, J. M., 1929 b. Résultats zoologiques de la croisiére Atlantique de l’“Armauer Hansen”. II. Les amphipodes gammarides. Mémoires de la Société royale des sciences de Liège, Ser. 3, 15 (2), 1–18.Google Scholar
Przibram, H., 1929. Quanta in biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 49, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, P. R., 1974. The vertical distribution of the siphonophores collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 25–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1955. Amphipoda (Hyperiidea) of the coast of tropical west Africa. Atlantide Report, No. 3, 7–40.Google Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 a. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. I. The total population and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 277–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 b. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. Systematic account: families Calanidae up to and including the Aetideidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 315–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 c. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. III. Systematic account: families Euchaetidae up to and including the Metridiidae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 525–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H. S. J., 1972 d. The vertical distributions and diurnal migrations of calanoid copepods collected on the SOND Cruise, 1965. IV. Systematic account of families of the numerically most important genera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 1021–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1926. Amphipoda 3: Die Gammariden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, 23, (5), 193–243.Google Scholar
Sheader, M. & Chia, F. S., 1970. Development, fecundity and brooding behaviour of the amphipod Marinogammarus obtusatus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1079–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheader, M. & Evans, F., 1974. The taxonomic relationship of Parathemisto gaudichaudi (Guerin) and P. gracilipes (Norman), with a key to the genus Parathemisto. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 915–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, C. R., 1945. The Amphipoda of the Bermuda Oceanographic Expeditions, 1929–1931. Zoologica, New York, 30, 185–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spandl, H., 1924. Die Amphipoden des Roten Meeres. Denkschriften der Akademie der Wissenschaften, 99, 19–73.Google Scholar
Spandl, H., 1927. Die Hyperiiden (exkl. Hyperiidea Gammaroidea und Phronimidae) der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 145–287.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1888. Amphipoda. Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876, 29, 1–1737.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1904. Biscayan plankton. Part II. The Amphipoda and Cladocera with notes on a larval thyrostracan. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), Ser. 2, 10, 13–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1915. Isopoda, Tanaidacea, Cumacea, Amphipoda (excl. Hyperiidea). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–1910, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D1, 1–53.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1918. Hyperiidea-Amphipoda Lanceolidae, Scinidae, Vibiliidae, Thaumatopsidae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–10, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D2, 1–70.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1924. Hyperiidea-Amphipoda (part 2: Paraphronimidae, Hyperiidae, Dairellidae, Phronimidae, Anchylomeridae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–10, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D4, 71–149.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1925. Hyperiidea - Amphipoda (part 3: Lycaeopsidae, Pronoidae, Lycaeidae, Brachyscelidae, Oxycephalidae, Parascelidae, Platyscelidae). Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions, 1908–10, to the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, 2, Biology, D5, 151–252.Google Scholar
Thurston, M. H., 1976 a. New pelagic amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) collected on the SOND Cruise. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, M. H., 1976 b. The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND Cruise, 1965. II. The Hyperiidea and general discussion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 383–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1956. Hyperiids (Amphipoda - Hyperiidea) of the western Behring Sea. (In Russian.) Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 35, 194–217.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1957. Hyperiids (Amphipoda) of the north western Pacific Ocean. 1. Tribe Hyperiidea Physosomata. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 20, 186–227. (English translation: Marine Biology, pp. 149–184. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Biological Sciences, 1959.)Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1960. Hyperiidea Physosomata of the tropical Pacific Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 41, 198–247.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1962. Hyperiidea (Amphipoda) collected by the Soviet Antarctic Expedition on d/e “Ob” south of 40°s. (In Russian.) Issledovaniya Fauny Morei, I (IX), Resultaty biologicheskikh issledovanii Sovetskoi antarkticheskoi ekspeditsii (1955–1958), 1, 1–35. (English translation: Biological Reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition (1955–1958), 1, 1–32, Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1966.)Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1964. Hyperiidea Physosomata from the northern part of the Indian Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 65, 107–151.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1968. Vertical Distribution of the Oceanic Zooplankton. 339 pp. (In Russian.) Moscow: Izdatelstvo Nauka. (English translation: Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1970.)Google Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1970. New data on the amphipods Hyperiidea Physosomata of the north-western part of the Pacific Ocean. (In Russian.) Trudy Instituta okeanologii. Akademiya nauk SSSR, 86, 382–400. (English translation: Fauna of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and its environment, 398–418. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1972.)Google Scholar
Vosseler, J., 1901. Die Amphipoden der Plankton-Expedition. 1. Theil. Hyperiidea 1. Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Siftung, 2, G.e., 1–129.Google Scholar
Wagler, E., 1926. Amphipoda 2: Scinidae der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, 20 (6), 317–446.Google Scholar
Wagler, E., 1927. Die Sciniden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 85–111.Google Scholar
Walker, A. O., 1909 a. Amphipoda Gammaridea from the Indian Ocean, British East Africa, and the Red Sea. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), Ser. 2, 12, 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. O., 1909 b. Amphipoda Hyperiidea of the ‘Sealark’ expedition to the Indian Ocean. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), Ser. 2, 13, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, T. H., Nunnemacher, R. F., Chace, F. A. & Clarke, G. L., 1939. Diurnal vertical migrations of deep-water plankton. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 76, 256–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltereck, R., 1927. Die Lanceoliden und Mimonectiden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 19, Zoologie 11, 57–84.Google Scholar
Yoo, K. I., 1970. On the distribution of the pelagic amphipod, Cyphocaris challenged (Gammaridea: Lysianassidae) in the western North Pacific. Korean Journal of Zoology, 13, 94–100.Google Scholar
Yoo, K. I., 1972. The biology of the pelagic amphipod, Primno macropa Guér. in the western North Pacific. 2. Geographical distribution and vertical distribution pattern. Korean Journal of Zoology, 15, 87–91.Google Scholar