Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:13:37.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Uptake of 65Zn By Dunaliella Tertiolecta Butcher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. D. R. Parry  and
J. Hayward
G. D. R. Parry*
Affiliation:
Botany Department, University College, Swansea
J. Hayward
Affiliation:
Botany Department, University College, Swansea
*
Present address: Department of Applied Biology, Chelsea College, University of London, Hortensia Road, London, S.W. 10.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of workers have studied the uptake of zinc by algae, but the mechanisms of uptake are not fully understood. Broda, Desser & Findennegg (1964) concluded that 65Zn uptake by Chlorella was a passive process since it was affected neither by metabolic inhibitors nor by anaerobic conditions. In later papers, however, Broda and co-workers (Matzku & Broda, 1970; Findennegg, Paschinger & Broda, 1971) have concluded that 65Zn uptake occurs both by a rapid passive process of ion-exchange and also by a slower, metabolically dependent process. Bachmann & Odum (1960) showed that65Zn uptake by Chaetomorpha was stimulated by light and they concluded that uptake was a metabolically active process. Gutknecht (1961,1963) showed that uptake of65Zn by Viva and Porphyra was stimulated by illumination and by increase in temperature. He also showed that increase in pH of the surrounding medium increased65Zn uptake and thus concluded that65Zn uptake was a passive process which was affected indirectly by metabolism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , November 1973 , pp. 915 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachmann, R. W. & Odum, E. P., 1960. Uptake of65Zn and primary productivity in marine algae. Limnology and Oceanography, 5, 349–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baric, A. & Branica, M., 1967. Polarography of sea water. I. Ionic state of cadmium and zinc in sea water. Journal of the Polarographic Society, 13, 4–8.Google Scholar
Broda, E., 1965. Mechanism of uptake of trace elements by plants. Experiments with radiozinc. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the Use of Isotopes and Radiation in Soil-Plant Nutrition Studies, Ankara, Turkey, pp. 207–16. Vienna: I.A.E.A.Google Scholar
Broda, E., Desser, H. & Findennegg, G., 1964. Wirkung von Dinitrophenol, Azid und Anaerobiose auf die Zinkaufnahme durch algen. Naturwissenschaften, 51, 361–2.Google Scholar
Bryan, G. W., 1969. The absorption of zinc and other metals by the brown seaweed Laminaria digitata. Journal of the Marine Biological Association United Kingdom, 49, 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, C. E. & Watson, D. G.,1968. Accumulation of32P and65Zn by living and killed plankton. Oikos, 19, 143–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G., 1970. Iron chelation and the growth of marine phytoplankton. I. Growth kinetics and chlorophyll production in cultures of the euryhaline flagellate Dunaliella tertiolecta under iron-limiting conditions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez-Altares, C. & Bornemieza, E., 1967. The localisation of65Zn in germinating corn tissues. Plant and Soil, 26, 175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findennegg, G., Paschinger, H. & Broda, E., 1971. Untershuchung der Lichtabhangig Keit der Aufnahme von Rubidium, Zink, Kobalt, Blei und cer derch Chlorella nach einer Flussmethode. Planta, 99, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutknecht, J., 1961. Mechanisms of radioactive zinc uptake by Ulva lactuca. Limnology and Oceanography, 6, 426–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutknecht, J., 1963. 65Zn uptake by benthic marine algae. Limnology and Oceanography, 8, 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzku, S. & Broda, E., 1970. Die Zinkaufnahme in das Innere von Chlorella. Planta, 92, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macrobbie, E. A. C., 1965. The nature of the coupling between light energy and active ion trans-port in Nitella translucens. Biochimica et biophysica acta, 94, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, W. H. W. & Budd, K., 1972. Zinc uptake in Neocosmospora vasinfecta. Journal of General Microbiology, 72, 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provasoli, L., Mclaughlin, J. J. A. & Droop, M. R., 1957. The development of artificial media for marine organisms. Archiv fur Mikrobiologie, 25, 392–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. A., 1967 a. Ion transport in Hydrodictyon africanum. Journal of General Physiology, 50, 1607–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. A., 1967&. Light stimulation of active transport in Hydrodictyon africanum. Journal of General Physiology, 50, 1627–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, J. F., 1962. Mineral Salt Absorption in Plants, 196 pp. Oxford: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. G. & Marshall, C., 1971. The accumulation of65Zn by root homogenates of zinc tolerant and non-tolerant clones of Agrostis tenuis Sibth. New Phytologist, 70, 539–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zirino, A. & Healy, M. L., 1970. Inorganic zinc complexes in sea water. Limnology and Oceanography, 15, 956–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zirino, A. & Yamamoto, S., 1972. A pH-dependent model for the chemical speciation of copper, zinc, cadmium and lead in sea water. Limnology and Oceanography, 17, 661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar