Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:11:38.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ultrastructure of the heart-body of the lugworm, Arenicola marina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. P. Dales
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College (University of London), Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey TW20 OEX
M. O. Cummings
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College (University of London), Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey TW20 OEX

Extract

The gross anatomy of the heart-body of the lugworm Arenicola grubii Clap, was described by Gamble & Ashworth (1900) and Ashworth (1904) who noted that it was also well developed in A. ecaudata Johnston (Ashworth, 1904) but was absent in A. claparedii Levinsen and A. cristata Stimpson. These authors noticed that there was no trace of a heart-body in young specimens of A. marina (L.) but that it was recognisable in worms measuring 65 mm or more in length. In such worms the heart-body tissue was described as consisting of two simple layers. In larger worms the layers are invaded by tissue resembling the wall of the heart and are probably invaginations of it. Dissection does suggest that the heart-body which lies only within the ventricle, is indeed formed by invaginations from the wall of the heart.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, J. H., 1904. Arenicola. L.M.B.C. Memoirs on Typical British Marine Plants and Animals, no. 11, 118 pp.Google Scholar
Braunbeck, T. & Dales, R. P., 1984. The role of the heart-body and of the extravasal tissue in disposal of foreign cells in two polychaete annelids. Tissue and Cell, 16, 557563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunbeck, T. & Dales, R. P., 1985. The ultrastructure of the heart-body and extravasal tissue in the polychaete annelide Neoamphitrite figulus and Arenicola marina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 653662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton-Gorius, J., 1963. Etude au microscope électronique des cellule chloragogènes d'Arenicola marina L. Leur rôle dans le synthèse de l'hémoglobine. Annales des sciences naturelles (Zoologie), 5, 211272.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P. & Pell, J., 1970. Cytological aspects of haemoglobin and chlorocruorin synthesis in polychaete annelids. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie, 109, 3032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, M. M. & Weiss, L., 1980. An electron microscopic study of haemoglobin synthesis in the marine annelid Amphitrite ornata (Polychaeta: Terebellidae). Journal of Morphology, 164, 121138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, F. W. & Ashworth, J. H., 1900. The anatomy and classification of the Arenicolidae, with some observations on their postlarval stages. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 43, 419569.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. Y. & Dales, R. P., 1958. The function of the heart-body in polychaetes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 14—31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermack, D. M., 1948. Blood system of the gut of Arenicola marina. Nature, London, 162, 576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangum, C. P. & Dales, R. P., 1965. Products of haem synthesis in polychaetes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 15, 237257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakao, T., 1974. An electron microscope study of the circulatory system in Nereis japonica. Journal of Morphology, 144, 217236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed