Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:10:25.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tube-Worm Spirorbis Vitreus and its Distribution in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. J. Crisp ,
Julie H. Bailey  and
E. W. Knight-Jones
D. J. Crisp
Affiliation:
Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Anglesey
Julie H. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Swansea
E. W. Knight-Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Spirorbis vitreus (Fab.), an arctic form, seems to be absent from Wales and most of England, but is generally abundant off the west coast of Scotland and also occurs in certain localities off Ireland, the Isle of Man, Cornwall and Brittany (which is probably its southern limit in Europe). Its range thus extends farthest down our western coasts, a distribution which is characteristic of various other northern and southern forms that are near the limits of their geographical ranges. Such species presumably benefit from the equable temperatures, adjoining deep water, and this winter-breeding species of Spirorbis also needs freedom from abrasion.

The tubes of juvenile S. vitreus are very different from those of adults. The distribution of uncini on the abdomen shows a remarkable bilateral asymmetry, as in S. spirillum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , October 1967 , pp. 511 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergan, P., 1953a. On the anatomy and reproduction biology in Spirorbis (Daudin). Nytt. Mag. Zool, Vol. 1, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bergan, P., 1953b. The Norwegian species of Spirorbis (Daudin). Nytt. Mag. Zool., Vol. 1, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1917. Über die Spirorbisarten Schwedens nebst einem versuch zu einer neuen Einteilung der Gattung Spirorbis. Zool. Bidr. Upps., Vol. 5, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Buchan, S., 1965. Factors affecting the quantity of suspended inorganic material. Rep. Challenger Soc, Vol. 3 (17), pp. 29.Google Scholar
Bush, K. J., 1904. Tubicolous annelids of the tribes Sabellidae and Serpulidae from the Pacific Ocean. Harriman Alaska Exped., Vol. 12, pp. 169–355.Google Scholar
Caullery, M. & Mesnil, F., 1897. Études sur la morphologie comparée et la phylogénie des espèces chez les Spirorbes. Bull, scient. Fr. Belg., T. 30, pp. 185–233.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1958. The spread of Elminius modestus Darwin in north-west Europe. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 483–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Fischer-Piette, E., 1959. Répartition des principales espèces intercotidales de la côre atlantique française en 1954–1955. Annls Inst. océanogr., Monaco, T. 36, pp. 275–387.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Southward, A. J., 1958. The distribution of intertidal organisms along the coasts of the English channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 157–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Southward, A. J., 1959. The further spread of Elminius modestus in the British Isles to 1959. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 429–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauvel, P. 1927. Polychètes sédentaires. Faune Fr., T. 16, pp. 390–1.Google Scholar
Gee, J. M., 1964. The British Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) with a description of Spirorbis cuneatus sp.n. and a review of the genus Spirorbis. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 143, pp. 405–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. M. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1962. The morphology and larval behaviour of a new species of Spirorbis (Serpulidae). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 641–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitching, J. H., 1950. Distribution of the littoral barnacle Chthamalus stellatus around the British Isles. Nature, Lond., Vol. 165, p. 820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores, pp. 125–6. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Moyse, J., 1963. A comparison of the value of various flagellates and diatoms as food for barnacle larvae. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 28, pp. 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson-Smith, A. & Gee, J. M., 1966. Serpulid tubeworms (Polychaeta Serpulidae) around Dale, Pembrokeshire. Fid Stud., Vol. 2, pp. 331–57.Google Scholar
Pixell, H. L. M. 1912. Polychaeta from the Pacific coast of North America. I. Serpulidae, with a revised table of classification of the genus Spirorbis. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 65, pp. 784–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiévreux, C., 1962. Morphologie et anatomie des larves de Spirorbis vitreus (Fabricus) et Spirorbis malardi (Caullery et Mesnil). Cah. Biol. mar., T. 3, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Quiévreux, C. 1963. Sécretion tubipare des larves de Spirorbinae (Annélides Polychetes). Cah. Biol. mar., T. 4, pp. 399–406.Google Scholar
Shelbourne, J. E., 1957. The oyster stock in the rivers Crouch and Roach, Essex. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2., Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J. & Crisp, D. J., 1954. The distribution of certain intertidal animals around the Irish coast. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. B, Vol. 57 (1), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J. & Crisp, D. J., 1954. Recent changes in the distribution of the intertidal barnacle Chthamalus stellatus Poli and Balanus balanoides L. in the British Isles. J. Anim. Ecol. Vol. 23, pp. 163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimpson, W., 1854. Synopsis of the marine Invertebrata of Grand Manan. Smithson. Contr. Knowh., Vol. 6., pp. 29.Google Scholar
Uschakov, P., 1955. Polychaeta from the Far Eastern Seas of the U.S.S.R. 445 pp. Moscow: Soviet Acad. Sci.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, E., 1952. Serpulidae (Polychaeta) collected by C. Dons along the Norwegian coast. K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Vol. 6., pp. 1–22.Google Scholar