Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:18:01.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trophic ecology of the octocoral Carijoa riisei from littoral of Pernambuco, Brazil. I. Composition and spatio-temporal variation of the diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Ana K.F. Lira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Mestrado em Biologia Animal, 50670901, Recife, PE, Brazil
Jean-Philippe Naud
Affiliation:
Université de Sherbrooke, Maîtrise en Écologie Internationale, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
Paula B. Gomes
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Departamento de Biologia, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, PE, Brazil
Andre M. Santos
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CAV, Rua do Alto do Reservatório s/n, Bela Vista, 55608680 Vitória de Santo Antão, PE, Brazil
Carlos D. Perez*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CAV, Rua do Alto do Reservatório s/n, Bela Vista, 55608680 Vitória de Santo Antão, PE, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Carlos D. Perez, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CAV, Rua do Alto do Reservatório s/n, Bela Vista, 55608680 Vitória de Santo Antão, PE, Brazil email: [email protected]

Abstract

Octocorals are common components of sublittoral benthic communities in temperate, tropical and polar areas. However, their natural diets and feeding rates are poorly known. The aim of this study was to determine qualitatively–quantitatively the diet of the octocoral Carijoa riisei (snowflake coral) and analyse the distribution and diet composition throughout a whole year at two different depths of the same environment. Hence, 30 colonies were haphazardly sampled for gastric content analysis from 2 and 6 m deep (surface and bottom) at Porto de Galinhas beach, Pernambuco, Brazil, in January, June and October 2006, and March 2007. Relative and absolute abundance, richness and occurrence frequency per gastric cavity were assessed. Shannon–Wiener index (H′) and evenness were also calculated. Items were classified according to the occurrence frequency. The biovolume of preys was estimated from meristic data, and from the biovolume were then estimated wet weight, dry weight and organic carbon. Weighed biovolume (WBV), which relates biomass and abundance, was assessed to estimate the real contribution of preys to octocoral diet. Results attested the presence of 102 phytoplankton and 25 zooplankton taxa. Mean prey size was 112.7 µm. Diatoms showed the greater richness with 88 morphotypes. Only cyanophytes and diatoms, from phytoplankton, were very common (>70%). As a whole, phytoplankton was also the most abundant group (83%), followed by crustacean fragments (5%). Thus, although having low biovolume (<0.09 mm3×10−3), the phytoplankton showed the highest WBV (44.5%). Feeding items richness was homogeneous throughout the study year and in both depths, while abundance showed significant seasonal and bathymetric fluctuation. The t-test (Hutchinson) found significant differences for prey item diversity related to depth and season. From the analysis, it is possible to conclude that the C. riisei population of the Brazilian north-eastern coast is polyphagous, but shows preference for phytoplanktonic elements and small prey. Therefore, the species behaves as a passive suspensivorous feeder with equitable biomass contribution from phytoplankton and zooplankton.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acuña, F.H. and Zamponi, M.O. (1995) Feeding ecology of intertidal sea anemones (Cnidaria, Actiniaria): food sources and trophic parameters. Biociencias 3, 7384.Google Scholar
Anthony, K.R.N. (1999) Coral suspension feeding on fine particulate matter. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 232, 85106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, K.R.N. (2000) Enhanced particle-feeding activity of corals on turbid reefs (Great Barrier Reef, Australia). Coral Reefs 19, 5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, R.P.M., Joenje, M., de Jong, I., Lambrechts, D.Y.M. and Nieuwland, G. (1998) Bacterial suspension feeding by coral reef benthic organisms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 175, 85288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, J.R. (1966). Studies on the chemical composition of the major zooplankton groups in the Sargasso Sea of Bermuda. Limnology and Oceanography 11, 520528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, N.S. (1996) Beach-rocks do litoral pernambucano, estudo sedimentológico e análise de isótopos estáveis. MSc thesis. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.Google Scholar
Coma, R., Gili, J.-M., Zabala, M. and Riera, T. (1994) Feeding and prey capture cycles in the aposymbiotic gorgonian Paramuricea clavata. Marine Ecology Progress Series 115, 257270.Google Scholar
Coma, R., Gili, J.-M. and Zabala, M. (1995) Trophic ecology of a benthic marine hydroid, Campanularia everta. Marine Ecology Progress Series 119, 221–220.Google Scholar
Coma, R., Ribes, M., Orejas, C. and Gili, J.-M. (1999) Prey capture by a benthic coral reef hydrozoan. Coral Reefs 18, 141145.Google Scholar
Concepcion, G.T., Crepeau, M.W., Wagner, D., Kahng, S.E., Toonen, R.J. (2008) An alternative to ITS, a hypervariable, single-copy nuclear intron in corals, and its use in detecting cryptic species within the octocoral genus Carijoa. Coral Reefs 27, 323336.Google Scholar
Fabricius, K. (1996) Herbivory in soft corals: correction. Science 273, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabricius, K., Benayahu, Y. and Genin, A. (1995) Herbivory in asymbiotic soft corals. Science 286, 9092.Google Scholar
Genzano, G.N. (2005) Trophic ecology of a benthic intertidal hydroid, Tubularia crocea, at Mar del Plata, Argentina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 307312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gili, J.-M. and Coma, R. (1998) Benthic suspension feeders: their paramount role in littoral marine webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 316321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gili, J.-M., Alva, V., Coma, R., Orejas, C., Pages, F., Ribes, M., Zabala, M., Arntz, W., Bouillion, J., Boero, F. and Hughes, R.G. (1997) The impact of small benthic passive suspension feeders in shallow marine ecosystems: the hydroids as an example. Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden 323, 99105.Google Scholar
Gravier-Bonnet, N. and Mioche, D. (1996) Annual survey of hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) cohabiting in shrimp-crevices on a reef of La Réunion (Indian Ocean). Scientia Marina 60, 165181.Google Scholar
Grigg, R.W. (2003) Invasion of a deep water coral bed by an alien species, Carijoa riisei. Coral Reefs 22, 121122.Google Scholar
Hall, K.J., Weimer, W.C. and Fred Lee, G. (1970) Amino acids in an estuarine environment. Limnology and Oceanography 15, 162164.Google Scholar
Hardy, E.R., Robertson, B. and Koste, E. (1984) About the relationship between the zooplankton and fluctuating water levels of Lago Camaleão, Central Amazonian várzea Lake. Amazoniana 9, 4352.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, H., Dürselen, C.-D., Kirschtel, D., Pollingher, U. and Zohary, T. (1999) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35, 403424.Google Scholar
Kahng, S.E. and Grigg, R.W. (2005) Impact of an alien octocoral, Carijoa riisei, on black corals in Hawaii. Coral Reefs 24, 556562.Google Scholar
Krebs, C.J. (1989) Ecological methodology. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.B. (1982) Feeding behaviour and feeding ecology of the Octocorallia (Coelenterata: Anthozoa). Journal of Zoology 196, 371384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Fuerte, F.O., Beltrones, D.A.S. and Aguero, G.C. (2007) Biovolumen ponderado; índice para estimar la contribución de espécies en asociaciones de diatomeas bentônicas. Hidrobiologica 17, 8386.Google Scholar
Migné, A. and Davoult, D. (2002) Experimental nutrition in the soft coral Alcyonium digitatum (Linnaeus, 1758). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 43, 916.Google Scholar
Muus, B.J. (1968) A field method for measuring ‘exposure’ by means of plaster balls, a preliminary account. Sarsia 34, 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann-Leitão, S. and Matsumura-Tundisi, T. (1998) Dynamics of a perturbed estuarine zooplanktonic community: Port of Suape, PE, Brazil. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Limnologie 26, 19811988.Google Scholar
Neves, B.M., Lima, E.J.B. and Perez, C.D. (2007) Brittle stars associated (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) with the octocoral Carijoa riisei (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) from the littoral of Pernambuco, Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 307312.Google Scholar
Orejas, C., Gili, J.M., Alvá, V. and Arntz, W. (2000) Predatory impact of an epiphytic hydrozoan in an upwelling area in the Bay of Coluino (Dicharta, Chile). Journal of Sea Research 44, 209–209.Google Scholar
Orejas, C., Gili, J.-M. and Arntz, W. (2003) Role of small-plankton communities in the diet of two Antartic octocorals (Primnoisis antartica and Primnoella sp.). Marine Ecology Progress Series 250, 105116.Google Scholar
Perez, C.D. (2002) Octocorais (Cnidaria, Octocorallia) do litoral pernambucano (Brasil). In Tabarelli, M. and Silva, J.M.P. (eds) Diagnóstico da biodiversidade de Pernambuco. Recife: Editora Massangana, pp. 365368.Google Scholar
Rees, J.T. (1972) The effect of current on growth form in an octocoral. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 10, 115123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribes, M., Coma, R. and Gili, J.-M. (1999) Heterogeneous feeding in benthic suspension feeders: the natural diet and grazing rate of the temperate gorgonian Paramuricea clavata (Cnidara: Octocorallia) over a year cycle. Marine Ecology Progress Series 183, 125137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribes, M., Coma, R. and Rossi, S. (2003) Natural feeding of the temperate asymbiotic octocoral–gorgonian Leptogorgia sarmentosa (Cnidaria: Ocotocorallia). Marine Ecology Progress Series 254, 141150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossa, D.C., Bonecker, C.C. and Fulone, L.J. (2007) Rotifer biomass in freshwater environments: review of methods and influencing factors. Interciencia 32, 220226.Google Scholar
Rossi, S., Ribes, M., Coma, R. and Gili, J.-M. (2004) Temporal variability in zooplankton prey capture rate of the passive suspension feeder Leptogorgia sarmentosa (Cnidaria: Octocorallia), a case study. Marine Biology 144, 8999.Google Scholar
Schlichter, D. and Brendelberger, H. (1998) Plasticity of the scleractinian body plan: functional morphology and trophic specialization of Mycedium elephantotus (Pallas, 1766). Facies 39, 227242.Google Scholar
Sebens, K.P. and Koehl, M.A.R. (1984) Predation on zooplankton by the benthic anthozoans Alcyonium siderium (Alcyonacea) and Metridium senile (Actiniaria) in the New England subtidal. Marine Biology 81, 255271.Google Scholar
Sebens, K.S., Grace, S.P., Helmuth, B., Maney, E.J. Jr. and Miles, J.S. (1998) Water flow and prey capture by three scleractinian corals, Madracis mirabilis, Montastrea cavernosa and Porites porites, in a field enclosure. Marine Biology 131, 347360.Google Scholar
Slattery, M., McClintock, J.B. and Bowser, S.S. (1997) Deposit feeding: a novel mode of nutrition in the Antarctic colonial soft coral Gersemia antarctica. Marine Ecology Progress Series 149, 299304.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1996) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Yu.I. (1990) Plankton in the reef ecosystems. In Dubinsky, Z. (ed.) Ecosystems of the world. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 291328.Google Scholar
Souza, J.R.B., Rodrigues, H.A., Neves, B.M. and Perez, C.D. (2007) First report of bristleworm predator of the reef octocoral Carijoa riisei. Coral Reefs 26, 1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsounis, G., Rossi, S., Laudien, J., Bramanti, L., Fernández, N., Gili, J.-M. and Arntz, W. (2005) Diet and seasonal prey capture rates in the Mediterranean red coral (Corallium rubrum L.). Marine Biology 149, 313325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widding, A. and Schlichter, D. (2001) Phytoplankton: a significant trophic source for soft corals? Helgoland Marine Research 55, 198211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edition. London: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar