Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:57:58.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symplectella rowi (Porifera: Hexactinellida: Lyssacinosida) is a rossellid, not a euplectellid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2014

Martin Dohrmann
Martin Dohrmann*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Palaeontology and Geobiology, Molecular Geo- and Palaeobiology Lab, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:M. Dohrmann, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Palaeontology and Geobiology, Molecular Geo- and Palaeobiology Lab, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The monospecific hexactinellid sponge genus Symplectella endemic to New Zealand waters was originally assigned to family Rossellidae within the order Lyssacinosida (subclass Hexasterophora), although affinities to family Euplectellidae were also noted. Seventy-eight years later, the genus was transferred to Euplectellidae (subfamily Corbitellinae) on rather subjective grounds. Here, I test these two competing taxonomic hypotheses with molecular phylogenetic methods and demonstrate that Symplectella rowi is indeed a rossellid, as was originally suggested. The genus is officially transferred back to Rossellidae (subfamily Rossellinae), which represents another small step towards a more natural classification system of glass sponges.

Keywords

ClassificationEuplectellidaeHexactinellidaintegrative taxonomymolecular phylogeneticsPoriferaRossellidaeSymplectella
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 9th World Sponge Conference held in Fremantle Australia in 2013: New Frontiers in Sponge Science , March 2016 , pp. 291 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dendy, A. (1924) Porifera. Part I. Non-Antarctic sponges. Natural History Report. British Antarctic (‘Terra Nova’) Expedition, 1910 (Zoology) 6, 269–392.Google Scholar
Dohrmann, M., Collins, A.G. and Wörheide, G. (2009) New insights into the phylogeny of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida): monophyly of Lyssacinosida and Euplectellinae, and the phylogenetic position of Euretidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohrmann, M., Göcke, C., Reed, J. and Janussen, D. (2012a) Integrative taxonomy justifies a new genus, Nodastrella gen. nov., for North Atlantic “Rossella” species (Porifera: Hexactinellida: Rossellidae). Zootaxa 3383, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, M., Haen, K.M., Lavrov, D.V. and Wörheide, G. (2012b) Molecular phylogeny of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida): increased taxon sampling and inclusion of the mitochondrial protein-coding gene, cytochrome oxidase subunit I. Hydrobiologia 687, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrmann, M., Janussen, D., Reitner, J., Collins, A.G. and Wörheide, G. (2008) Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Systematic Biology 57, 388–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, D.M. and Bull, J.J. (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (2002) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C. and Serio, G. (1984) A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pattengale, N.D., Alipour, M., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Moret, B.M.E. and Stamatakis, A. (2010) How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Journal of Computational Biology 17, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiswig, H.M. (2002a) Family Aulocalycidae Ijima, 1927. In Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Plenum, pp. 1362–1371.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H.M. (2002b) Family Aphrocallistidae Gray, 1867. In Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Plenum, pp. 1282–1286.Google Scholar
Reiswig, H.M. and Stone, R.P. (2013) New glass sponges (Porifera: Hexactinellida) from deep waters of the central Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Zootaxa 3628, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savill, N.J., Hoyle, D.C. and Higgs, P.G. (2001) RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods. Genetics 157, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. and Rougemont, J. (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57, 758–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, K.R. (2002a) Family Euplectellidae Gray, 1867. In Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Plenum, pp. 1388–1434.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, K.R. (2002b) Family Rossellidae Schulze, 1885. In Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Plenum, pp. 1441–1505.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, K.R. and Menshenina, L.L. (2002) Family Hyalonematidae Gray, 1857. In Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Plenum, pp. 1232–1263.Google Scholar
Van Soest, R.W.M., Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K., de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Manconi, R., Schönberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R., Klautau, M., Picton, B., Kelly, M., Vacelet, J., Dohrmann, M., Díaz, C. and Cárdenas, P. (2014) World Porifera Database. http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed