Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:10:02.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spiracular Gills in the Marine Fly Aphrosylus and their Relation to the Respiratory Horns of Other Dolichopodidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. E. Hinton
H. E. Hinton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The larva of the dolichopodid fly Aphrosylus celtiber Haliday is an omnivorous carnivore in the intertidal zone. It pupates in an air-filled cocoon of debris and a secretion of the labial glands. The pupa has plastron-bearing spiracular gills that have been evolved from respiratory horns similar to those of recent terrestrial Dolichopodidae.

Although the spiracular gills are pupal structures, they are the chief respiratory organs of the young adult, i.e. the pharate adult, before it emerges from the cocoon. At the pupal-adult apolysis the layer of epidermis that secreted the gill wall and the layer that secreted the spiracular atrium are left behind in the lumen of the gill, together with blood, as the body wall epidermis retracts away from the pupal cuticle. A thin sheet of cuticle, the basal membrane, is secreted across the opening into the gill lumen at this time. The epidermis and blood in the gill lumen are thus completely isolated from the haemocoele of the living animal by the basal membrane, a layer of moulting fluid, and the adult cuticle. The tissue contained in the respiratory horns of terrestrial Dolichopodidae is isolated in a precisely similar manner.

The tissue isolated in the lumen of the gill of Aphrosylus does not degenerate until after the pupal-adult ecdysis. It seems to be discarded because, on balance, its loss is less damaging than the cost that would be incurred in other ways by its absorption or retraction into the body of the adult. For instance, in order to absorb the tissue in such long appendages, or to retract all of the epidermis from within them, would necessarily prolong the moulting period, a period when the insect is particularly vulnerable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , October 1967 , pp. 485 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dyte, C. E., 1959. Some interesting habits of larval Dolichopodidae (Diptera). Ent. mon. Mag., Vol. 95, pp. 139–43.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1955. The structure of the spiracular gill of the genus Lipsothrix (Tipulidae), with some observations on the living epithelium isolated in the gill at the pupa-adult moult. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 30, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1957. The structure and function of the spiracular gill of the fly Taphrophila vitripennis. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. 247, pp. 90–120.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1962. The structure and function of the spiracular gills of Deuterophlebia (Deuterophlebiidae) in relation to those of other Diptera. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 138, pp. 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1964. The respiratory efficiency of the spiracular gill of Simulium. J. Insect Physiol., Vol. 10, pp. 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1965. The spiracular gill of the fly Orimargula australiensis and its relation to those of other insects. Aust. J. Zool., Vol. 13, pp. 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1966 a. Plastron respiration in marine insects. Nature, Lond., Vol. 209, pp. 220–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1966 b. The spiracular gill of the fly Eutanyderus (Tanyderidae). Aust. J. Zool., Vol. 14, pp. 365–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1966 c. Respiratory adaptations of the pupae of beetles of the family Psephenidae. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, Vol. 251, pp. 211–45.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1967. Plastron respiration in the marine fly Canace. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 47 pp. 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubaud, M., 1904. Sur les larves marines de Dolichopodes attributes au genera Aphrosylus (Wlkr.). Bull. Mus. Hist. nat. Paris, T. 9, pp. 338–40.Google Scholar
Saunders, L. G., 1928. Some marine insects of the Pacific coast of Canada. Ann. ent. Soc. Am., Vol. 21, pp. 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, B. J., 1960. On the tissue isolated in some of the larval appendages of Sialis lutaria L. at the larval-pupal moult. J. Insect Physiol., Vol. 4, pp. 235–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. E., 1952. Immature stages of the marine fly, Hypocharassus pruinosus Wh., with a review of the biology of immature Dolichopodidae. Am. Midl. Nat., Vol. 48, pp. 421–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar