Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:20:10.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spiophanes adriaticus, a new species from the Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2019

Michela D'Alessandro*
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Laboratory of Milazzo, Via dei Mille 46, 98057Milazzo, ME, Italy
Luca Castriota
Affiliation:
ISPRA sts Palermo, Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo n. 4521 (ex complesso Roosevelt), Località Addaura, 90149Palermo, Italy
Teresa Maggio
Affiliation:
ISPRA sts Palermo, Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo n. 4521 (ex complesso Roosevelt), Località Addaura, 90149Palermo, Italy
Federica Nasi
Affiliation:
Sezione di Oceanografia, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale – OGS, I-34151Trieste, Italy
Marilyn Carletti
Affiliation:
Sezione di Oceanografia, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale – OGS, I-34151Trieste, Italy
Rocco Auriemma
Affiliation:
Sezione di Oceanografia, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale – OGS, I-34151Trieste, Italy
Teresa Romeo
Affiliation:
ISPRA, Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Laboratory of Milazzo, Via dei Mille 46, 98057Milazzo, ME, Italy Stazione Zoologica Anton Dorhn, Centro Interdipartimentale della Sicilia, Via dei Mille 46, 98057, Milazzo, ME, Italy
Paola Del Negro
Affiliation:
Sezione di Oceanografia, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale – OGS, I-34151Trieste, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Michela D'Alessandro, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Morphological and genetic investigations have led to the identification of Spiophanes adriaticus sp. nov. (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from the North Adriatic Sea (Central Mediterranean). A total of 81 specimens were recorded along the sublittoral zone between 8 and 27.5 m of depth. This species differs from other congeners by having: two pairs of black eyes, a cirriform occipital antenna, dorsal ciliated organs as thin bands usually extending to chaetigers 11–12, dorsal ciliated crests from chaetiger 14–17, undulate glandular opening on chaetigers 5–7, unhooded hooks from the 15th chaetiger and Y shaped tubes. A detailed description and illustrations are provided for the new species. Through DNA barcoding results and comparison of DNA sequences of the new species with those of other congeners available in the GenBank database, the validity of the new finding was confirmed. Spiophanes adriaticus sp. nov. represents the eighth species of Spiophanes recorded for the Mediterranean Sea. A key for the identification of Mediterranean Spiophanes species is also provided.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barroso, R, Klautau, M, Solé-Cava, AM and Paiva, PC (2010) Eurythoe complanata (Polychaeta: Amphinomidae), the ‘cosmopolitan’ fireworm, consists of at least three cryptic species. Marine Biology 157, 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, JA, Hilbig, B and Scott, PH (eds) (1996) Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and the Western Santa Barbara Channel. Volume 6. The Annelida Part 3. Polychaeta: Orbiniidae to Cossuridae. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, 418 pp.Google Scholar
Carr, CM, Hardy, SM, Brown, TM, Macdonald, TA and Hebert, PD (2011) A tri-oceanic perspective: DNA barcoding reveals geographic structure and cryptic diversity in Canadian polychaetes. PLoS ONE 6, e22232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çinar, ME, Bilecenoglu, M, Ozturk, Β, Katagan, Τ, Yokes, Μ, Aysel, V, and Erdogan, H (2011) An updated review of alien species on the coasts of Turkey. Mediterranean Marine Science 12, 257315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çinar, ME, Dağlı, E and Şahin, GK (2014) Checklist of Annelida from the coasts of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 38, 734764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claparède, É (1870) Les annélides chétopodes du Golfe de Naples. Memoires de la Société de physique et d'histoire naturelle de Genève 20, 365542.Google Scholar
D'Alessandro, M, Cosentino, A, Giacobbe, S, Andaloro, F and Romeo, T (2014) Description of a new species of Abyssoninoe (Polychaeta: Lumbrineridae) from north-east Sicily (central Mediterranean Sea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 94, 747752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Alessandro, M, Romeo, T, Castriota, L, Cosentino, A, Perzia, P and Martins, R (2016) New records of Lumbrineridae (Annelida: Polychaeta) in the Mediterranean biogeographic province, with an updated taxonomic key. Italian Journal of Zoology 83, 233243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dağlı, E (2008) Taxonomy and Ecology of Spionidae (Polychaeta- Anneliida) Distributed Along the Sublittoral Area of the Turkısh Coast of the Aegean Sea (PhD thesis). Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.Google Scholar
Dağlı, E (2013) Two new records for the Polychaeta fauna of the Sea of Marmara: Laubieriellus salzi and Spiophanes afer (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology 37, 376379.Google Scholar
Dağlı, E, Çinar, ME and Ergen, Z (2011) Spionidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the Aegean Sea (eastern Mediterranean). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 78, 4964.Google Scholar
Day, J (1967) A Monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa: Part 2. Sedentaria. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), no. 656, 878 pp.Google Scholar
Di Camillo, CG, Gravili, C, De Vito, D, Pica, D, Piraino, S, Puce, S and Cerrano, C (2018) The importance of applying Standardised Integrative Taxonomy when describing marine benthic organisms and collecting ecological data. Invertebrate Systematics 32, 794802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folmer, O, Black, M, Hoen, W, Lutz, R and Vrijenhoek, R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294299.Google ScholarPubMed
Grube, AE (1850) Die Familien der Anneliden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Berlin 16, 249364.Google Scholar
Grube, AE (1860) Beschreibung neuer oder wenig bekannter Anneliden. Fünfter Beitrag. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Berlin 26, 71118, plates III–V.Google Scholar
Hebert, PDN, Cywinska, A, Ball, SL and de Waard, JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 270, 313321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imajima, M (1991) Spionidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) from Japan. VII. The Genus Spiophanes. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series A 17, 115137.Google Scholar
Lardicci, C (1989) Censimento dei policheti dei mari italiani. Spionidae Grube, 1850. Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Naturali, Memorie, Serie B 96, 121152.Google Scholar
Larkin, MA, Blackshields, G, Brown, NP, Chenna, R, McGettigan, PA, McWilliam, H and Thompson, JD (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23, 29472948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laubier, L (1964) Un spionidien des vases bathyales de Banyuls-sur-Mer, Spiophanes kroyeri reysii ssp. n. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France 89, 562577.Google Scholar
Maciolek, NJ (2000) New species and records of Aonidella, Laonice, and Spiophanes (polychaeta: Spionidae) from shelf and slope depths of the Western North Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science 67, 529547.Google Scholar
Meißner, K (2005) Revision of the genus Spiophanes (Polychaeta, Spionidae); with new synonymies, new records and descriptions of new species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 81, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meißner, K and Blank, M (2009) Spiophanes norrisi sp. nov. (Polychaeta: Spionidae) a new species from the NE Pacific coast, separated from the Spiophanes bombyx complex based on both morphological and genetic studies. Zootaxa 2278, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meißner, K and Hutchings, PA (2003) Spiophanes species (Polychaeta: Spionidae) from Eastern Australia with descriptions of new species, new records and an emended generic diagnosis. Records of the Australian Museum 55, 117140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, CP and Paulay, G (2005) DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLOS Biology 3, 22292238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikac, B (2015) A sea of worms: polychaete checklist of the Adriatic Sea. Zootaxa 3943, 1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musco, L, Çinar, ME and Giangrande, A (2005) A new species of Sphaerosyllis (Polychaeta, Syllidae, Exogoninae) from the coasts of Italy and Cyprus (eastern Mediterranean Sea). Italian Journal of Zoology 72, 161166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygren, A and Pleijel, F (2010) From one to ten in a single stroke – resolving the European Eumida sanguinea (Phyllodocidae, Annelida) species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58, 132141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettibone, MH (1962) New species of polychaete worms (Spionidae: Spiophanes) from the east and west coast of North America. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 75, 7788.Google Scholar
Rouse, GW and Pleijel, F (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 354 pp.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Stecher, G, Peterson, D, Filipski, A and Kumar, S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 27252729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JD, Higgins, DG and Gibson, TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 46734680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tovar-Hernández, MA, Licciano, M and Giangrande, A (2007) Revision of Chone Krøyer, 1856 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) from the eastern central Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea with descriptions of two new species. Scientia Marina 71, 315338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westheide, W and Schmidt, H (2003) Cosmopolitan vs cryptic meiofaunal polychaete species: an approach to a molecular taxonomy. Helgoland Marine Research 57, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenetos, A, Çinar, ME, Crocetta, F, Golani, D, Rosso, A, Servello, G, and Verlaque, M (2017) Uncertainties and validation of alien species catalogues: the Mediterranean as an example. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 191, 171187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar